Maersk | Investor Presentation Deck | 53 slides

Maersk · 2020-05
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

53
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
03
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
04
Strategic transformation context; includes LTM trend lines on top two charts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction
05
The slide uses a standard corporate reporting layout with bulleted key statements on the left and a grid of big-number metrics on the right.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
Includes a table comparing Q1 2020, Q1 2019, and FY 2019 financial metrics.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
08
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
09
Includes a broken axis on the Revenue metric to accommodate the large scale difference.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
10
The slide uses two bar charts to compare annual historical data (2016-2019) with guidance (2020-2021) and quarterly performance (Q1 2019-Q1 2020).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
11
The slide highlights the drivers of free cash flow, specifically noting the impact of lower CAPEX and working capital changes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
12
The chart illustrates the bridge between opening and closing net debt positions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
13
Financial highlights slide from Maersk Q1 2020 interim report.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
14
Includes a combo chart showing EBITDA (bars) and EBITDA margin (line) over five quarters, plus a summary table comparing Q1 2020, Q1 2019, and FY 2019.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ActionLoop · Hypothesis Test
15
The chart uses a standard waterfall bridge to explain the variance in EBITDA between two periods.show_valuation_bridge
Open slide detailBeat · ActionLoop · Hypothesis Test
16
Includes specific breakdown of freight rates and volumes by trade route (East-West, North-South, Intra-regional).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ActionLoop · Hypothesis Test
17
Part of Maersk Q1 2020 interim report.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
18
Includes a combo chart showing gross profit (bars) and margin (line) over five quarters, plus a summary table of key financial metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
19
EBIT conversion ratio formula provided at the bottom.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
20
Includes a combo chart (bar/line) and a summary data table.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
21
The slide uses a structured list format to present operational and financial KPIs for the business unit.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
22
Includes a disclaimer regarding IFRS16 adjustments for 2016-2017 data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
23
The slide highlights the impact of COVID-19 on the Qingdao factory and the performance of Maersk Supply Service.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
24
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Action
25
The table shows the impact of specific variables on EBITDA for the remainder of the year.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
26
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Action
27
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
28
The chart displays debt maturity from 2020 to 2026+ with a breakdown of leases, bank debt, corporate bonds, and undrawn facilities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
29
The chart includes a break in the y-axis between 10 and 40 DKK bn to accommodate the 2015 outlier.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
30
The slide uses a color-coded system (red/yellow/green) to represent growth performance relative to 2012-2018 averages.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
31
The slide highlights market share percentages and relative rankings (No. 1, No. 2, etc.) for various global trade lanes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
32
The slide illustrates market concentration through both individual market share and alliance groupings.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Action
33
The slide tracks M&A activity in the liner shipping industry from 1996 to 2020, highlighting three distinct waves of consolidation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
34
The slide compares nominal capacity growth with effective capacity and demand growth, highlighting a contraction in Q1 2020.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
35
The slide highlights the supply-side factors contributing to capacity reduction in early 2020.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
36
The slide presents four distinct time-series charts comparing 2020 data against previous years.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
37
The slide uses two donut charts for volume segmentation and a dual-axis line chart for freight rate trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
38
Maersk Q1 2020 appendix slide.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
39
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
40
The slide compares quarterly performance metrics for Maersk's shipping operations.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
41
The slide provides a detailed breakdown of unit costs for Maersk in 2019, supported by a donut chart and a detailed footnote explaining the composition of each analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
42
The chart tracks TEU capacity alongside a breakdown of owned vs chartered vessels.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
43
Maersk Line is highlighted in light blue.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
44
Source: Alphaliner. Note: As at end-March 2020.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
45
The slide serves as an appendix page providing a visual overview of the company's physical footprint.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Action
46
Contains four distinct charts: a donut chart for throughput, a stacked bar for terminal count, a bar chart for concession length, and a combo chart for volume ganalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
47
Note at bottom clarifies TEU and investment figures represent 100% of the projects.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
48
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to represent terminal activity over time, with dark blue bars for acquisitions/projects and light grey bars for divestmentanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
49
The slide uses a line chart for historical cost trends and a donut chart for cost composition.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
50
The table distinguishes between consolidated businesses, JV & Associates, operating businesses, and implementations.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
51
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
52
The table highlights that these terminals are in a construction/implementation phase, resulting in minimal or zero operational throughput and negative/negligiblanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
53
closing_ask
Open slide detailBeat · Action