Kinnevik | Results Presentation Deck | 13 slides

Kinnevik · 2020-04
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

13
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
03
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Need
04
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Cost Of Inaction
05
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure to highlight the impact of increased demand on two specific portfolio companies.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
06
The slide uses a split-screen approach to compare two companies, Livongo and Babylon, with supporting metrics and partner logos.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide uses a comparison structure to contrast the impact on two different business models within the travel sector.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
08
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
09
The chart uses a bridge/waterfall structure to explain the delta in NAV, categorizing impacts by sector resilience.show_valuation_bridge
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · So What Cascade
10
The chart is a waterfall-style bridge showing the transition from 2019 Q4 to 2020 Q1 valuation.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · So What Cascade
11
The slide uses a waterfall chart to bridge cash and debt components to a net position.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ActionLoop · So What Cascade
12
Uses a numbered list format with large circular icons.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
13
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Action