AgroFresh | SPAC Presentation Deck | 48 slides

AgroFresh · 2015-06
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

48
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
03
transition
04
The slide uses a vertical list format with numbered circular icons overlaid on a graphical element.summarize
05
front_matter
07
Includes a map of geographic presence and financial charts (bar and pie).summarize
08
frame_problem
09
The slide uses two side-by-side bar charts to establish a 'problem' context for food waste reduction.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
other
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide uses a 2x2-style grid layout to categorize products by maturity (current vs. near-term).present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
12
Uses a value chain framework to map product benefits to specific stages.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
13
transition
14
Uses the acronym SPEED to structure the growth strategy.plan_implementation
15
Uses waterfall charts to illustrate the economic value proposition.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
16
The chart uses a line graph to show seasonal price fluctuations of Gala apples, highlighting the ROI of the treatment.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
17
The slide uses visual arrows to emphasize the 'gap' between current penetration and the higher benchmarks set by North America and ANZ.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market Size
18
Uses a before-after visual comparison to demonstrate product efficacy.present_solution
19
This is a section divider or transition slide.present_solution
20
present_solution
21
The slide uses a comparison of margins and a pie chart of sales to argue that patent protection is not a primary driver of profitability for AgroFresh.analyze_data
22
The slide uses a comparison frame to establish market leadership and technical superiority.compare_peers
23
The slide uses a consistent visual style for each testimonial block, emphasizing key phrases in bold teal text.illustrate_case
24
transition
25
The slide uses a split-column layout to categorize growth strategies.plan_implementation
26
The slide uses a four-column layout to categorize M&A strategy into Focus Areas, Financial Characteristics, Synergy Potential, and Pipeline.plan_implementation
27
transition
28
Includes detailed footnotes explaining non-GAAP adjustments and definitions for EBITDA, Cash Conversion, and FCF Yield.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
29
Includes footnotes regarding non-GAAP financial measures and adjustments.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Financials
30
transition
31
The slide presents two distinct sponsors (Avenue Capital Group/Boulevard and Dow) with supporting data for each.other
32
Includes detailed footnotes regarding share counts, PIPE investment, and financial definitions.analyze_data
33
The slide uses bar charts to compare AgroFresh against four distinct peer segments: Food/Ingredients Specialties, Service Oriented Comps, High Margin/High Valuecompare_peers
34
The slide uses bar charts to compare AgroFresh (highlighted in yellow) against competitors categorized into four segments: Food/Ingredients Specialties, Servicecompare_peers
35
Includes a disclaimer at the bottom regarding SEC review.plan_implementation
38
Includes detailed footnotes explaining the specific adjustments made for deferred income, foreign currency, taxes, depreciation, R&D, and stand-alone costs.analyze_data
39
The slide provides a detailed breakdown of adjustments including deferred income, foreign currency, taxes, D&A, R&D, and stand-alone costs.analyze_data
40
Includes detailed footnotes explaining warrant exercise assumptions and share types.analyze_data
41
transition
42
The slide uses a table structure to compare regional metrics including sales percentage, key countries, storage duration, and SmartFresh adoption.analyze_data
43
The slide uses two distinct chart types to demonstrate market demand and product efficacy.analyze_data
44
The chart shows four series: Control, 7-Sep, 18-Sep, and 21-Sep application dates.show_traction
45
The chart shows that Harvista maintains firmness above the consumer threshold longer than the control or AVG groups.show_traction
46
present_solution
47
Includes a pie chart showing consumer purchase drivers and a visual comparison of treated vs. untreated bananas.present_solution
48
The slide uses a table structure to compare three specific products (two fungicides, one insecticide) across sales volume, pricing, and qualitative commentary.compare_peers