Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH)

William Ackman · 2025-02
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

55
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes legal disclaimer regarding Schedule 13D filing.front_matter
03
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
Includes a footnote regarding the unaffected price date.propose_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
Includes a callout box explaining Bill Ackman's personal look-through ownership.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
07
plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
08
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to show the parent company and its subsidiaries.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
09
plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
10
The slide uses the Pershing Square 13D filing date as the baseline for outperformance.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
11
The slide uses a visual anchor to contrast the $90 issuance price against the $61.46 unaffected price to demonstrate underperformance.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
12
The slide uses a funnel-like narrative to show the lack of interest from 284 investors down to zero formal offers.preempt_rebuttal
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
13
diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
14
frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
15
transition
16
present_solution
17
introduce_nominees
18
Includes tenure in years for each employee; dashed boxes indicate new hires joining in early 2025.introduce_nominees
19
The slide uses a table to reconcile total post-transaction shares with the specific look-through stake of the Pershing Square team.quantify_opportunity
20
Includes annotations for market events (Global Financial Crisis, Covid-19, Rapid interest rate hiking cycle) and performance periods.analyze_data
21
The slide uses a combination of a detailed list and an icon-based summary to communicate the firm's investment philosophy.summarize
22
frame_problem
23
The slide highlights a 935 bps outperformance per annum vs the S&P 500.compare_peers
24
The slide highlights a 1,300 bps per annum outperformance vs S&P 500.compare_peers
25
present_framework
26
Uses a table-like structure to frame historical performance as a failure of the target company.expose_contradiction
27
The slide highlights the efficacy of Pershing Square's hedging strategy as a counter-narrative to HHH/GGP's performance.cite_precedent
28
The slide emphasizes a long-term track record and unique informational advantages.establish_context
29
The slide uses a 'Range of Engagement' vs 'Value Creation' structure to demonstrate historical impact.illustrate_case
30
summarize
31
The slide uses a mix of bullet points and nested sub-bullets to detail specific Pershing Square vehicles (PSH, PSTH, SPARC).summarize
32
The timeline uses color-coded dots (green for equity, blue for debt) to distinguish transaction types.summarize
33
transition
34
propose_solution
35
Addresses a potential critique regarding compensation structure.preempt_rebuttal
36
Uses a contrast-based framework to highlight HHH's superior fee and governance structure compared to standard PE.compare_peers
37
The slide uses a comparison frame to establish a precedent for sponsor ownership stakes.compare_peers
38
The slide highlights the fee structure differences between Brookfield's standard entities and HHH, specifically noting HHH's lack of performance fees.compare_peers
39
The slide uses a comparison table to justify a lower fee ratio for the proposed HHH entity.compare_peers
40
The slide uses a contrast-based layout to highlight the competitive advantages of the HHH Services Agreement (no performance fees, no upfront commissions, dailycompare_peers
41
The slide highlights the total fee burden as a percentage of average NAV.quantify_opportunity
42
The slide uses a contrast-based layout to highlight the competitive advantages of the HHH Services Agreement (no performance fees, daily liquidity).compare_peers
43
The slide uses a table to break down fee attribution by shareholder group, highlighting that only 52% of fees are truly incremental.preempt_rebuttal
44
The slide uses a green callout box to highlight the core strategic question.frame_problem
45
transition
46
The chart illustrates volatility in REIT valuations relative to NAV over a 21-year period.analyze_data
47
The slide uses a dot-plot style visualization to compare two data series over time.expose_gap
48
The slide uses a contrast-based argument to invalidate a common valuation metric.preempt_rebuttal
49
diagnose_problem
50
The slide uses a 'preempt_rebuttal' structure to argue that the company has no viable alternatives if the activist's proposal is rejected.preempt_rebuttal
51
The slide uses a historical stock chart to support a narrative about investor sentiment during a specific transformation period.establish_context
52
summarize
53
state_next_steps