EHang Holdings, Ltd. (EH)

Wolfpack Research · 2021-02
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 1 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

3
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

33
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
This is the cover/summary page of a short-seller report by Wolfpack Research.expose_contradiction
02
This is a page from a short-seller research report (likely Wolfpack Research on EHang).expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
03
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/003.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
04
This is a short-seller research note excerpt highlighting legal jeopardy.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
05
Short-seller research note style; uses photographic evidence to debunk corporate claims.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
06
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/006.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
07
This is a short-seller research note alleging fraud based on physical site inspection.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Zoom In
08
This is a research note documenting a site visit, specifically highlighting the lack of professional manufacturing infrastructure.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Zoom In
09
This is a research note slide from a short-seller report (likely Hindenburg Research or similar) questioning the manufacturing claims of EHang (EH).expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose ContradictionLoop · Zoom In
10
Uses visual evidence to undermine the credibility of the subject company's manufacturing capabilities.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
11
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/011.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
12
The slide uses visual evidence (photos) to debunk a specific claim made by 'EH'.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
13
The slide uses visual evidence (photo) to contradict claims of manufacturing capability and highlights financial risk via a footnote citation.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
14
The slide presents a dialogue between an analyst (WP) and an expert (MM) to discredit EHang's technical capabilities.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
15
The slide uses visual comparison and red annotations to highlight the similarity between the motors.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
16
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/016.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
17
Investigative short-seller style narrative page (Page 17 of 33). Mixes long-form prose, an evidentiary photo, a callout annotation, and footnoted citations to Eexpose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
18
The slide uses a satellite image to cast doubt on the scale of the company's testing facilities.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
19
The slide uses excerpts from SEC filings to expose potential fraudulent or inflated revenue reporting.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
20
Contains excerpts from legal contracts and SEC filings to support allegations of sham revenue.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
21
Short-seller research note style; uses aggressive language ('abhorrently high', 'fabricated sales').expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
22
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/022.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
23
The slide uses a 'before-after' style comparison of a rendering/model versus reality to discredit the company's claims.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
24
Page 24 of 33. Combines a video-still illustration, narrative prose, a block pull-quote from EH's 20-F, and concluding analytical paragraph.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
25
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/025.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
26
The slide uses a 'Reality vs. Claim' structure to expose corporate deception.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
27
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison to highlight discrepancies between English and Chinese marketing materials versus regulatory facts.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
28
The slide uses a two-part argument structure ('First', 'Second') to establish the importance of the entity and the severity of the legal action.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
29
Page 29 of 33. Table evidences a related-party financing scheme; Chinese-language screenshots paired with English translations of Plaintiff, Cause, Court, and Danalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
30
The slide highlights a specific liability line item as evidence of a potential investor-to-creditor conversion and subsequent legal dispute.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
31
Image file /tmp/legacy-images/eeb36d3ea12a/slides/031.jpg not present on disk; cannot inspect.
32
Page 32 of 33other