Dinakar Singh · activist-deck
SandRidge Energy (SD)
32 pages · 2 arc beats · 2 loops
SandRidge Energy (SD)
Dinakar Singh · 2013-01 arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
12468101214161820222426283032
Deck intelligence map
2 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 30 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
The Monster 7 slides 100% 7/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides · 46 hits — 0/7 slides
— 0/7 slides
100% 7/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides · 12 hits The Struggle 23 slides 100% 23/23 slides 100% 23/23 slides · 124 hits — 0/23 slides
— 0/23 slides
87% 20/23 slides 100% 23/23 slides 100% 23/23 slides Slide inventory
32 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
03
This slide uses a 'preempt_rebuttal' strategy by quoting the company's own accusations against the activist and then reframing the activist's position as a prinpreempt_rebuttal
04
Uses a rhetorical questioning technique to build a case for conflict of interest.expose_contradiction
05
The slide uses direct quotes from a 2012 proxy statement to highlight potential conflicts of interest.expose_contradiction
06
The slide uses a bulleted list to build a narrative of investigative discovery.expose_contradiction
07
This is a classic activist 'villain' slide, specifically focusing on governance failure and potential fraud.expose_contradiction
08
The slide uses a list-based approach to systematically dismantle a corporate disclosure.expose_contradiction
09
The slide uses a series of rhetorical questions to frame a governance and conflict-of-interest narrative.state_demand
11
Uses a timeline diagram to visualize the 'flipping' of assets between WCT Resources and SandRidge.expose_contradiction
12
Uses a timeline diagram to visualize the discrepancy between the acquisition dates and the subsequent sale/disclosure.expose_contradiction
13
Uses a timeline diagram to visualize the discrepancy between the company's stated acquisition date and the actual transaction history.expose_contradiction
14
Uses a timeline diagram to visualize the contradiction between official disclosure and actual events.expose_contradiction
15
Uses a timeline diagram to visualize the discrepancy between the disclosed narrative and the actual transaction sequence.expose_contradiction
16
Uses a timeline diagram to visualize the discrepancy between public disclosure and private transaction history.expose_contradiction
17
Uses a visual grid to represent land parcels changing hands between WCT, SandRidge, and Shell.expose_contradiction
18
Uses a grid-based visual representation to show the progression of land ownership and transactions.expose_contradiction
19
Uses a grid-based visual to represent land ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
20
Uses a visual grid to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
21
Uses a grid-based visual to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
22
Uses a grid-based visual representation to show land ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
23
Uses a visual grid to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
24
Uses a visual grid to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
25
Uses a visual grid to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
26
Uses a visual grid to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
27
Uses a grid-based visual representation to show land ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
28
Uses a grid-based visual to represent acreage ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
29
Uses a grid-based visual representation to show the transfer of acreage between entities over time.expose_contradiction
30
The slide uses a visual grid to represent land parcels changing hands over time.expose_contradiction
31
Uses a grid-based visual to represent land ownership changes over time.expose_contradiction
32
Uses a 4x4 grid to represent a 640-acre section divided into 40-acre units.appendix