Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK)

Richard T. McGuire III · 2017-11
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

6
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

59
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · The Ordinary World
02
other
Open slide detailBeat · The Ordinary World
03
other
Open slide detailBeat · The Ordinary World
04
other
Open slide detailBeat · The Ordinary World
05
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · The Ordinary World
06
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · The Call to Adventure
07
The slide uses a list-based structure to present arguments against the incumbent board and for the activist's proposed strategy.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · The Call to Adventure
08
transition
Open slide detailBeat · The Call to Adventure
09
The slide uses a 'Why give Board another opportunity to fail?' rhetorical question as a closing hook.name_villain
Open slide detailBeat · The Call to Adventure
10
The chart highlights a significant negative performance gap for Deckers compared to all benchmarks.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
11
The chart highlights the significant underperformance of Deckers relative to its peers and broader indices.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
12
Uses a vertical dashed line to demarcate the event of the 13D filing.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
13
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight the negative variance and a red callout box to pose a rhetorical question to investors.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
14
The slide uses a 'broken promise' narrative structure to challenge board competence.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
15
The slide uses red dashed boxes to highlight specific misses and the cumulative failure to meet guidance.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
16
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to overlay store count (bars) with ROIC and margin percentages (lines).diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
17
Uses a direct quote from an earnings call to expose management's lack of progress.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
18
The slide uses a dual-axis combo chart (bar + line) to demonstrate that costs are outpacing revenue growth.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
19
Uses red text to emphasize critical data points and concerns within the quotes.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
20
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Expose Contradiction
21
Uses a combination of bar charts to contrast capital deployment with negative financial performance outcomes.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
22
The slide uses two bar charts to demonstrate that the company has been cash-rich and cash-generative for over a decade, implying capital mismanagement.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
23
frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
24
The slide uses a 'A' icon as a bullet point, likely representing the activist firm's branding.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
25
Uses a dual-axis chart (line for share price, bar for CEO comp) combined with a data table showing EPS guidance vs actuals and incentive structures.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
26
The slide uses a red box to highlight the period of decline and a dashed box to indicate the change in reporting policy.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
27
Uses red dashed boxes to highlight the reporting change and the resulting lack of transparency.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
28
The slide uses a before-and-after comparison to demonstrate how accounting practices mask declining retail performance.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
29
Uses a series of quotes to build a case against management/board transparency.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
30
The slide uses a narrative of governance failure to justify shareholder intervention.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
31
Uses red dashed boxes to highlight specific periods of concern (strategic review/candidacy and sale failure/share sales).expose_contradiction
32
Uses a direct quote comparison to expose management inconsistency.expose_contradiction
33
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show cash flow and share repurchases impacting net cash balances over time.preempt_rebuttal
34
The slide uses a 'Promise vs. Failure' structure to build a case for management incompetence or lack of accountability.expose_contradiction
35
Uses a quote-based structure to frame the board's inaction as a failure of governance.expose_contradiction
36
The slide uses a comparison table structure to contrast two directors against specific governance criteria.expose_contradiction
37
The slide uses red text for specific experience and performance metrics to emphasize the negative correlation.name_villain
38
The slide uses a visual timeline of red diamonds to emphasize sales and the absence of blue diamonds (purchases).expose_contradiction
39
Uses a table to detail share transactions and a rhetorical question at the bottom to drive the activist narrative.expose_contradiction
40
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
41
show_valuation_bridge
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
42
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to correlate store expansion with margin erosion. It includes estimates for FY2016 and FY2017 post-consolidation.diagnose_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
43
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to bridge lost retail EBIT to net EBIT increase via channel shift and cost savings.quantify_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
44
The slide uses a quote to preemptively argue against standard retail performance metrics.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
45
Uses a deductive logic flow to break down company guidance and isolate the impact of cost savings versus revenue growth.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
46
The slide uses an external consultant's estimate to highlight a gap between the potential savings ($150-200M) and the company's current target ($32M).size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
47
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for historical/projected price and a data table for key performance indicators.show_valuation_bridge
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
48
cite_precedent
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
49
The slide uses red text to highlight key phrases within the quote.cite_precedent
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
50
The slide uses a peer company (WWW) as a precedent to validate the activist's proposed strategy for the target company.preempt_rebuttal
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)
51
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
52
introduce_nominees
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
53
introduce_nominees
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
54
introduce_nominees
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
55
introduce_nominees
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
56
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
57
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
58
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
59
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction