Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK)

Jeffrey Smith · 2025-03
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 1 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

3
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

8
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
This is the first page of an activist investor letter.frame_problem
02
The slide uses a bar-grouped chart to illustrate performance gaps, followed by a narrative justifying shareholder intervention.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
03
The slide uses a 'bloated cost structure' narrative to argue for operational improvement.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
04
The slide uses a peer benchmarking approach to highlight Autodesk's underperformance in profitability metrics.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)
05
This is a text-heavy shareholder letter page arguing against management's guidance.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
06
The slide uses a waterfall bridge to visualize the gap between theoretical margin expansion and actual guidance.expose_contradiction
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide uses a waterfall bridge to justify a specific margin target based on cost savings and incremental revenue growth.show_valuation_bridge
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction
08
This is a closing letter from an activist investor deck.state_demand
Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Cost Of Inaction