AECOM (ACM)

Peter A. Feld · 2019-06
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

1
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 9 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 9 slides 100% 9/9 slides 100% 9/9 slides · 69 hits
0/9 slides
11.1% 1/9 slides 66.7% 6/9 slides · 9 hits
0/9 slides
0/9 slides

Slide inventory

9
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
This is a formal activist investor letter.front_matter
02
The slide uses a waterfall chart to show acquisition history, with a callout box detailing URS's own acquisition history.frame_problem
03
Letter-format page (running prose with embedded charts) rather than a traditional slide. Synergy targets cited: $250M raised to $325M with FY2017 impact promiseexpose_contradiction
04
The slide uses a comparison table to frame the company's performance as a failure of management execution rather than market conditions.compare_peers
05
The slide argues for operational improvement or divestiture of the MS segment based on margin underperformance.compare_peers
06
Includes a case study reference to Jacobs Engineering as a template for turnaround.compare_peers
07
The slide uses two charts to demonstrate performance: a bar chart for EBITDA margin growth and a bar chart for TSR comparison.analyze_data
08
This is a text-heavy page from an activist investor letter (Starboard Value) outlining specific strategic recommendations for AECOM.propose_solution
09
Includes a waterfall-style bridge and a bar chart comparison.show_valuation_bridge