Pitch deck: Azoma raises $4M to help brands show up in AI search

Azoma

arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS

Deck intelligence map

coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Narrative range 15 total

Metadata

Components

Metrics

Tools

Frameworks

Beats

Loops

Attention 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 29 hits

— 0/5 slides

20% 1/5 slides

— 0/5 slides

100% 5/5 slides · 6 hits 20% 1/5 slides Problem (Identify pain) 3 slides 100% 3/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 19 hits

— 0/3 slides

33.3% 1/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 5 hits 100% 3/3 slides Agitate (Make it worse) 3 slides 100% 3/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 18 hits

— 0/3 slides

33.3% 1/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 4 hits 33.3% 1/3 slides Solution (Provide relief) 2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides · 11 hits

— 0/2 slides

50% 1/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides Desire 2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides · 12 hits

— 0/2 slides

100% 2/2 slides

— 0/2 slides

100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides

Slide inventory

every slide · same image gating as the playbook

front_matter

Open slide detailBeat · Attention

other

Open slide detailBeat · Attention

inspire_vision

Open slide detailBeat · Attention

The slide features a mix of global enterprise brands and a photo of professionals in a meeting.show_traction

Open slide detailBeat · Attention

The slide uses visual examples of Amazon Rufus and ChatGPT to illustrate the shift.argue_timing

Open slide detailBeat · AttentionLoop · Cost Of Inaction

The chart shows a time-series comparison of Amazon app sessions with and without Rufus, sourced from Sensor Tower.show_traction

Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction

The chart is a Marimekko/Mosaic plot showing the distribution of user intent categories.show_traction

Open slide detailBeat · Problem (Identify pain)Loop · Cost Of Inaction

Data sourced from Statista survey of US shoppers.analyze_data

Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)

The chart uses a gradient of purple to represent different traffic sources, with ChatGPT at the top (14%) and Google at the bottom (3%).show_traction

Open slide detailBeat · Agitate (Make it worse)

The chart uses a grouped bar structure to compare adoption vs non-adoption across three business segments.analyze_data

Open slide detail

The slide uses a numbered list format to explain the service methodology.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Golden Circle

The slide details a technical process flow for an AI SEO platform, referencing specific patent-related steps.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Golden Circle

The slide displays a patent flow diagram (US12169850) illustrating the steps from data import to automated publishing.present_framework

Open slide detail

The slide displays three mobile app screens showing a recipe for 'Pesto Eggs on Toast' as an example of generated content.present_solution

Open slide detail

The slide uses a screenshot of a GA4 traffic acquisition report to validate the claim.show_traction

Open slide detailBeat · DesireLoop · Quick Win Big Bet

The slide uses a specific Amazon analytics tool screenshot (likely Keepa) to demonstrate performance improvement.show_traction

Open slide detailBeat · DesireLoop · Quick Win Big Bet

The slide uses two pie charts to contrast citation distribution between two major AI answer engines.compare_peers

Open slide detail

The slide displays a SaaS dashboard UI with multiple data visualization components.present_solution

Open slide detail

The matrix uses logos and pricing as data points to position competitors.compare_peers

Open slide detail