An inside look at Eaze's latest pitch deck reveals vastly scaled back ambitions from the once-soaring cannabis startup

Eaze
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

6
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

16
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
02
The slide uses a split-screen layout with a value proposition on the left and product screenshots on the right.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
03
Data as of May 2020; 2020 figures are a combination of actuals and projections.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Complication
04
show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Complication
05
compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
06
The slide uses a quantitative formula to justify the private label strategy.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Aha Moment
07
The chart uses a dual-axis approach: stacked bars for absolute GTV values and a line for the percentage of GTV controlled by Eaze.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Aha Moment
08
The chart shows a stacked bar chart for GTV (3rd party vs White Label) with a line overlay for penetration percentage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Aha Moment
09
The charts compare 'Circles' (blue) against 'All Other Brands' (red) over 14 days post-launch.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Aha Moment
10
The chart uses a standard waterfall structure to decompose transaction value into net contribution.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart shows the progression from Product Value (GMV) through various revenue additions and cost deductions to arrive at a final profit.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The chart uses blue bars for actuals up to April 2020 and gray bars for forecasts thereafter.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses color coding to distinguish the current operational focus (CA) from future expansion targets.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · ResolutionLoop · Why Now
14
The slide uses a three-column layout to present the company's strategic moats.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · ResolutionLoop · Why Now
15
The chart includes a mix of audited, unaudited, estimated, and forecasted data points.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · ResolutionLoop · Why Now
16
other
Open slide detailBeat · ResolutionLoop · Why Now