Krew offers equipment-free classes for a post-gym world. Check out the 18-slide deck it used to sell seed investors on being 'Peloton without the $3k bike.'

Krew

arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS

Deck intelligence map

coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Narrative range 18 total

Metadata

Components

Metrics

Tools

Frameworks

Beats

Loops

Problem 1 slides 100% 1/1 slides 100% 1/1 slides · 9 hits

— 0/1 slides

100% 1/1 slides 100% 1/1 slides · 2 hits 100% 1/1 slides · 2 hits Solution 3 slides 100% 3/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 18 hits

— 0/3 slides

100% 3/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 4 hits 100% 3/3 slides · 5 hits Evidence & Proof 2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides · 12 hits

— 0/2 slides

50% 1/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides

— 0/2 slides

Impact & Next Steps 12 slides 100% 12/12 slides 100% 12/12 slides · 62 hits

— 0/12 slides

33.3% 4/12 slides 66.7% 8/12 slides 100% 12/12 slides

— 0/12 slides

Slide inventory

every slide · same image gating as the playbook

The slide uses a visual metaphor of motion tracking to imply fitness technology.front_matter

Open slide detail

Uses an analogy to Peloton to quickly establish market positioning.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Golden Circle

The slide uses a dark-mode aesthetic with four distinct data-driven columns.frame_problem

Open slide detailBeat · ProblemLoop · Cost Of Inaction

Uses a comparison-style framing (Peloton minus the bike) to establish market positioning.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · SolutionLoop · Cost Of Inaction

The chart illustrates a massive cost disparity between traditional streaming infrastructure and the company's P2P/edge technology.compare_peers

Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof

Includes redacted data points and specific competitor pricing benchmarks (ClassPass, Peloton, Orangetheory).size_opportunity

Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof

The slide uses a checkmark/cross matrix to highlight Krew's competitive advantage.compare_peers

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide uses a dual-track approach (Product vs Traction) across four time horizons (Today, 6mo, 12mo, 18mo).plan_implementation

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

Includes logos of past employers/universities and hiring needs for seed round.other

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

Uses a pillar-based framework to organize product strategy.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide uses a horizontal arrow to indicate a strategic shift from commoditized features to high-moat, high-revenue potential features.analyze_data

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide uses a vertical arrow on the left to indicate a progression from 'Zoom-like' to 'Fully Proprietary' in terms of UX customization and development efforcompare_peers

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide uses a dark theme with a grey header row for logos.compare_peers

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide uses a structured list format to categorize barriers into P2P and Edge Computing challenges.other

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide uses a checkmark/cross matrix to highlight Krew's competitive advantages.compare_peers

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide highlights specific UI features for professional instructors, such as identifying injured students or top/bottom performers.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

The slide highlights a specific UI feature for professional trainers to provide feedback to users.present_solution

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps

Includes a callout explaining the strategy of camera-based accessibility vs. sensor integration.appendix

Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps