We got an exclusive look at the pitch deck that 3D printing startup nTopology used to raise a $40 million Series C

nTopology
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

27
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
The slide uses redacted blocks to hide sensitive metrics.argue_timing
Open slide detailBeat · Why NowLoop · Why Now
03
The slide uses a comparison table to highlight performance metrics against a competitor.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
04
The slide contrasts 'IMPOSSIBLE' traditional timelines with the current solution's speed.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
05
The slide uses a direct comparison table to highlight efficiency gains.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
06
The slide highlights efficiency gains in medical device design, specifically for Stryker.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
07
The slide layout suggests a grid of customer logos or testimonial blocks.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
08
The slide uses a large red block to redact customer names, likely for confidentiality.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
09
Uses a before-and-after visual contrast to frame the problem.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem StatementLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
Uses humor/memes to establish a relatable pain point for the target audience.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
11
Uses a visual metaphor of dinosaurs to represent legacy software (NX, Catia).frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
12
The chart uses a line graph to illustrate exponential growth in users over 33 months, with specific ACV and user count milestones annotated.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
13
The chart uses a red block to redact account names.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
14
The slide uses a process diagram to show nTop as a parallel or integrated step in the design workflow.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
15
The diagram on the right shows a process flow where nTop replaces or augments the 'Part Design' stage.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
16
Uses a 'Land and Expand' sales motion framework.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
17
The slide uses a 'Land and Expand' model to explain how TCV (Total Contract Value) grows through user adoption.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
18
The slide uses a flywheel-style process diagram to explain the user growth mechanism.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
19
The chart includes a redacted area, likely hiding specific user count labels or annotations.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
20
The slide uses redacted red boxes to hide specific quantitative performance data.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
21
The chart distinguishes between actual and projected performance, with specific ACV data points for 2019 and 2020.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
22
Includes a sales funnel diagram, a horizontal bar chart for industry breakdown, and a stacked bar chart for customer type.show_traction
Open slide detailBeat · Traction
23
Includes a section for 'Our Investors' with logos and names.other
24
state_next_steps
26
The slide shows a physical swab on the left and the software interface (nTopology) on the right, highlighting the speed of design iteration.present_solution
27
The interface shows a parametric design workflow where multiple variations of a lattice swab head are generated simultaneously.present_solution