2024 Bond Cap USA report 2025 exhibits

BOND
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

3
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

26
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
The slide serves as a title page for a report revisiting a 2011 analysis of US financial statements.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
03
The chart uses historical annotations to contextualize debt spikes during major wars and economic crises.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
04
The chart highlights a significant shift in debt dynamics post-2008, with debt rising while interest rates initially fell, followed by a recent uptick in rates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Need
05
The chart uses a long-term average line at 4.5% to contextualize the recent ZIRP era.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Need
06
The slide uses a dual-line chart to show long-term macroeconomic trends and a timeline-style summary of the GDP:Money Supply ratio.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Need
07
The chart uses CPI data to illustrate inflation/purchasing power erosion over time.establish_context
08
The slide uses a dual-axis chart combining a stacked bar chart for spending categories and a line chart for interest rates.analyze_data
09
The chart highlights the significant impact of lower interest rates on government debt servicing costs.quantify_impact
10
The slide uses two line charts to contrast nominal GDP (left) and PPP-adjusted GDP (right).analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
11
The chart uses a combination of bar charts for cash flow and a line chart for net worth, with a shaded region highlighting the period 'From USA Inc. in 2011'.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
12
The slide uses pie charts to visualize the composition of federal budget components.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
13
The slide uses pie charts to visualize the composition of US federal revenue and expenses.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
14
The slide uses bubble sizes to represent the magnitude of unfunded liabilities, with a specific note explaining the actuarial treatment of Medicaid.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
15
The chart highlights a divergence between entitlement-driven healthcare spending and budgeted education spending.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
16
The chart uses a combination of a historical trendline and annotations for major economic/war events to illustrate the departure from historical norms.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
17
The chart uses a shaded region to highlight data up to 2011, referencing 'USA Inc. in 2011'.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · So What Cascade
18
The chart highlights a structural deficit where entitlement spending and interest payments are projected to consistently exceed revenues.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
The slide uses a dual-axis chart to compare absolute headcount (bars) with percentage share of total employment (line) and projects a counterfactual trendline.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
The table uses a blue border to highlight the 'Defense' row.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide highlights the shift in federal spending priorities over nearly a century.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The slide uses a timeline arrow to categorize programs by decade of origin, comparing F2010 and F2023 expenses.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to overlay debt levels and deficit percentages, with shaded regions indicating historical economic crises.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The chart illustrates historical spikes in spending (likely war-related) followed by the modern trend of rising entitlement costs.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The chart uses a stacked area format to distinguish between primary deficit/surplus and net interest outlays, with a clear inflection point for the forecast peranalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The table uses color-coded text (black for 1965/2005, red for 2023) to highlight changes over time.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction