Ipsos Public Trust in AI

Ipsos
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

33
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
transition
06
Data source: Ipsos Public Trust in AI, March 2024. Base: All UK adults 16+ (n=5,150).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare usage frequency across two domains (work vs personal life).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The chart is a stacked bar chart representing survey responses across three categories: Benefit, Equal measure, and Lose out.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
Data source: Ipsos AI Monitor 2024. Base: All adults 16+ (n=5,098).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart uses clustering (Anglosphere, Europe, More Positive) to group countries by sentiment.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The chart displays a clear divergence in public sentiment based on the utility vs. intrusiveness of the AI application.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The chart displays comfort vs discomfort levels for 7 specific AI use cases.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The chart displays comfort vs discomfort levels for 6 specific AI use cases.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Voice Of Customer
17
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Voice Of Customer
18
The slide presents two stacked bar charts comparing AI usage expectations versus AI replacement expectations.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Voice Of Customer
19
Data source: Ipsos Public Trust in AI, March 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Voice Of Customer
20
The slide uses a two-column text layout with a large hero image on the right.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Voice Of Customer
21
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Voice Of Customer
22
transition
23
Data source: Ipsos, March 2024. Base: All UK adults 16+ who are in work (n=2,506).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
24
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
25
The chart uses a gauge-like visual to represent the 59% of the public who believe regulation is slower than technological progress.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
26
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
27
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
28
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
29
transition
30
This is a corporate profile slide introducing the firm's expertise.summarize
32
The slide describes the methodology for the research report, highlighting the use of random probability address-based sampling.summarize
33
The slide acts as a service menu or capability overview.present_solution