Education Monitor 2024 Ipsos

Ipsos
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 5
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

6
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

74
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Hook
02
The slide uses a three-column layout with a right-hand image. The text discusses Baby Boomers' views on youth, the lack of correlation between perceived educatisummarize
Open slide detailBeat · Hook
03
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
04
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
05
The slide uses a mix of donut charts, big numbers, and icons to present survey findings across 30 countries.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
06
The slide uses a 3x2 grid layout with icons to present distinct research insights.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
07
The slide contrasts objective PISA rankings with subjective public opinion on student performance.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
08
Data sourced from Ipsos Education Monitor 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
09
Data from Ipsos Education Monitor 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
10
Data points extracted from text: Gen Z (61%), Millennials (68%), Gen X (66%), Boomers (66%) for social media bans; Boomers (69%), Gen X (64%), Millennials (58%)summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
11
The slide uses text-heavy columns to summarize findings from the Ipsos Education Monitor 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
12
The slide uses a narrative approach to debunk a generational stereotype using global polling data.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
13
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
14
The chart uses a trend line to segment countries into those who are 'rightly proud' vs those who 'should be prouder'.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
15
transition
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
16
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries, interviewed 21 June – 5 July 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
17
The chart is sorted by the 'Better' category in descending order.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
18
The chart displays a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'A lot harder' to 'A lot easier', with net scores calculated on the right.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
19
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries, interviewed 21 June – 5 July 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
20
Data from Ipsos Education Monitor 2024.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · ComplicationLoop · Aha Moment
21
The chart shows a consistent trend where women perceive growing up today as harder than men do across all generations.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The chart uses a trend line to show the correlation between current quality and perceived improvement.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
transition
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide presents comparative survey data with 'Agree' and 'Disagree' percentages, alongside country-specific extremes.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The chart displays 'Agree' (teal) and 'Disagree' (pink) percentages for 30 countries plus a global average, sorted by agreement level.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The chart displays 'Agree' (teal) and 'Disagree' (pink) percentages for 30 countries, sorted by agreement level.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The chart uses a diverging bar structure to show 'Agree' (teal) vs 'Disagree' (pink) percentages.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
The chart uses a diverging bar structure to show 'Agree' (teal) vs 'Disagree' (pink) percentages across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries, interviewed 21 June – 5 July 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
The data is presented as a heatmap where darker red indicates higher percentages. The table includes a '30-country Average' column and 30 individual country colanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
33
The chart displays 8 categories of curriculum focus, comparing 'Too little', 'Just enough', and 'Too much' space, with a column highlighting countries with the analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
34
The slide uses horizontal bar charts to represent the percentage of respondents who feel there is 'too little space' for specific educational areas.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
35
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
36
The chart displays sentiment across four categories: More positive than negative, Equally positive and negative/neutral, No impact, and More negative than positanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
37
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
38
The chart shows a consistent gender gap where men report higher net positive sentiment than women across all generational cohorts.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
39
Data from Ipsos Education Monitor 2024.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
40
The chart displays 'Yes' (purple bars) and 'No' (light purple bars) responses, sorted by the 'Yes' percentage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
41
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 adults under 75.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
42
The chart displays 'Agree' (dark purple) and 'Disagree' (light purple) percentages for each country, sorted by the 'Agree' value.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
43
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
44
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
45
The chart shows a clear shift from school-led responsibilities (academic) to parent-led responsibilities (social/moral).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
46
The chart shows the percentage of respondents who believe a task is primarily the responsibility of parents, segmented by whether the respondent has children inanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
47
The chart uses a stacked bar approach where the primary bar represents 'teachers/schools' and the lighter bar represents 'parents'.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
48
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
49
The chart uses a diverging bar structure where the primary focus is the 'teachers/schools' percentage, with 'parents' as a secondary, lighter-colored bar.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
50
The chart uses a diverging bar structure where the dark purple bars represent 'teachers/schools' and light purple bars represent 'parents'.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
51
The chart uses a diverging bar structure where the primary bars (teachers/schools) are sorted in descending order, with corresponding parent responsibility percanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
52
The chart is sorted by the 'teachers/schools' responsibility percentage in descending order.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
53
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
54
The chart uses a stacked bar approach where the dark purple represents 'teachers/schools' and the light purple represents 'parents'.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
55
The chart uses a diverging bar structure where the dark purple bars represent the 'teachers/schools' responsibility percentage, and the light purple bars represanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
56
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
57
The chart uses a diverging bar structure where the dark purple bars represent the 'teachers/schools' responsibility percentage, and the light purple bars represanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
58
The chart displays a clear preference for parental responsibility across almost all surveyed countries, with Thailand and India being notable outliers.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
59
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries, interviewed 21 June – 5 July 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
60
The chart uses a diverging color palette to represent sentiment intensity (teal for positive, pink/red for negative).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Voice Of Customer
61
Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries, interviewed 21 June – 5 July 2024.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
62
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024, base 23,754 online adults under 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
63
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
64
The chart displays three categories: 'Too little space' (purple), 'Just enough space' (yellow), and 'Too much space' (light purple).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
65
The chart is sorted by the 'Too little space' category in descending order.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
66
The chart displays three categories: 'Too little space' (purple), 'Just enough space' (yellow), and 'Too much space' (light purple).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
67
The chart displays three categories: 'Too little space' (purple), 'Just enough space' (yellow), and 'Too much space' (light purple).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
68
The chart is sorted by the 'Too little space' category in descending order.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
69
The chart displays 30 countries plus a global average, ranked by the 'Too little space' category.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
70
The chart is sorted by the 'Too little space' category in descending order.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
71
Data source: Ipsos Education Monitor 2024. Base: 23,754 online adults under the age of 75 across 30 countries.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
72
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
73
other
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
74
other
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution