Third-party governance and risk management The threats are real

Deloitte
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

39
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
The slide uses a dramatic visual metaphor (polar bear) to emphasize the 'real' nature of threats in third-party risk management.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
Includes a headshot and signature of Owen Ryan.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The slide serves as a preface/foreword for a consulting report.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
TPGRM stands for Third-Party Governance and Risk Management.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide uses icons to represent risk levels and highlights a specific 'execution gap' in third-party governance.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
07
The slide uses two distinct colored boxes to contrast delivery model trends with the reality of third-party risks.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
TPGRM stands for Third-Party Governance and Risk Management.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
10
Includes two bar charts showing trends over time and a maturity model definition box.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
11
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix framework to categorize maturity levels and provides two data tables showing historical, current, and future states for eight industdiagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
12
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix framework repeated for three time periods to illustrate industry progression.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
13
The slide contrasts 'best-in-class' organizations with those that are 'uncontrolled' or 'unfulfilled' regarding third-party governance.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
14
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
15
The slide contains two grouped bar charts showing survey data for 'Past', 'Present', and 'Future' timeframes.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
16
Charts show shifts in traditional vs emerging drivers over time (past, present, future).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
17
The slide presents 6 grouped bar charts in total, organized into 3 columns by industry and 2 rows by driver type (Traditional vs Emerging).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
18
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
19
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
The slide uses a combination of a ranked table and a bubble chart to illustrate risk criticality and impact.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide combines a grouped bar chart showing incident types by industry and a ranking table of risk areas.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Mece Breakdown
22
The slide uses icons to represent specific risk management initiatives and quantifies the percentage of respondents adopting each.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Mece Breakdown
23
The chart displays 5 categories of initiatives across 8 industry segments.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Mece Breakdown
24
The slide uses a color-coded icon system to distinguish between high-confidence domains (blue) and low-confidence domains (green).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Mece Breakdown
25
The slide presents two grouped bar charts comparing confidence levels across 8 industry segments (BIPS, CB, E&R, FS, LSHC, MF, PS, TMT) for 8 different TPGRM doanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Mece Breakdown
26
The slide uses a donut chart to visualize survey responses regarding the frequency and urgency of third-party risk discussions at the board level.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
27
Includes a pie chart for accountability and a grouped bar chart for board agenda frequency by industry.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
28
Includes a bar chart using icon-based visualization and a pie chart for drivers of on-site reviews.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
29
Includes a Deloitte point of view callout box.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
30
The slide uses a combination of text, callout boxes, and donut charts to illustrate the tension between decentralization and standardized governance.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
31
The slide presents two charts: a grouped bar chart for decentralization levels and a stacked bar chart for third-party standard mandates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
32
Slide 09 of a larger report.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
33
The slide uses grouped bar charts to compare industry segments (BIPS, CB, E&R, FS, LSHC, MF, PS, TMT) across two categories: platform types and software functioanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
34
The slide uses icon-based visualizations to represent data points.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
35
Contains two stacked bar charts: one for model preference by industry, one for functions performed by in-house teams.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
38
This is a contact directory slide, likely from the end of a consulting deck.other