IIF/McKinsey Cyber Resilience Survey

McKinsey
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

24
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
The slide is essentially blank except for the source citation at the bottom right.appendix
03
front_matter
04
The slide uses a three-column layout with icons to structure the introduction.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
The slide details the survey structure (107 questions, NIST mapping) and the context of group discussions (IIF forums).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide provides a breakdown of the 27 survey participants across multiple dimensions.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
07
The slide provides a high-level overview of the survey structure and key takeaways from each section.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
The slide uses a map to visualize the geographic spread of the roundtable sessions.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
09
FSSCP functions are Governance, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover, and Supply chain/dependency management.analyze_data
10
The chart uses a radar/spider plot to compare average vs top-quartile resilience scores across 7 functions.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
11
The slide uses a pie chart to illustrate the distribution of infrastructure patch status among 27 respondents.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
12
The chart highlights a critical vulnerability management gap in cyber resilience.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
13
The word cloud represents qualitative survey data (n=20) where font size correlates with response frequency.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
14
The slide uses font size to represent the frequency of responses (n=20).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
15
The chart uses a pie format to segment respondents by their perception of cybersecurity spending levels.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The chart uses a mirrored bar chart format to compare underspending and overspending across seven cybersecurity functions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare coverage levels across three firm size categories (Under $500B, $500B-$1T, Over $1T).summarize
18
The word cloud uses font size to represent frequency of responses (n=18).diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Jobs To Be Done
19
The slide highlights the dual nature of cloud adoption in the context of cyber risk management.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Jobs To Be Done
20
Slide 18 from a McKinsey/IIF report.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Jobs To Be Done
21
The slide uses a numbered list format to present a structured approach to cybersecurity improvement.plan_implementation
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
24
front_matter