McKinsey · consulting-deck
Quantum Technology Monitor
103 pages · 5 arc beats · 3 loops
Quantum Technology Monitor
McKinsey arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
15101520253035404550556065707580859095100103
Deck intelligence map
5 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 28 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Setup 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 27 hits — 0/4 slides
50% 2/4 slides · 3 hits 25% 1/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Industry Trends 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 65 hits — 0/10 slides
— 0/10 slides
— 0/10 slides
100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides Market Sizing 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 27 hits — 0/4 slides
— 0/4 slides
— 0/4 slides
100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides Technological Breakthroughs 3 slides 100% 3/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 12 hits — 0/3 slides
— 0/3 slides
— 0/3 slides
100% 3/3 slides — 0/3 slides
Global Research and IP Landscape 7 slides 100% 7/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides · 45 hits — 0/7 slides
42.9% 3/7 slides — 0/7 slides
100% 7/7 slides — 0/7 slides
Slide inventory
103 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Features stylized isometric illustrations of quantum computing nodes.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
02
The slide uses a checkmark/cross system to indicate what is included vs. what is not (or perhaps what is a core focus vs. a list).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
03
Uses a Venn-like diagram to show the interconnected nature of the three subfields.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
04
Includes a footnote defining economic value and a McKinsey & Company branding.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
05
Data as of Jan 2024, retrieved from Patsnap database; patent data shown is for 2022, as data for 2023 is not yet completely reported.summarize
07
The slide uses a two-part structure to summarize key developments in the quantum technology sector.summarize
11
The slide compares QT start-up investment trends against broader global start-up funding trends.analyze_data
12
The slide uses a dark theme typical of McKinsey consulting decks. Data source is PitchBook.analyze_data
13
The slide uses a waterfall-style annotation to compare year-over-year percentage changes in total funding versus QT funding.analyze_data
14
Includes a line chart for investment trends and a bubble-based table for historical deal volume comparison.analyze_data
15
The slide uses a combination of an area/line chart for historical trends and a 100% stacked bar chart for recent composition.analyze_data
16
The chart uses a combination of a bar chart for annual counts and a line chart for cumulative totals. It highlights a -43.5% decline from 2022 to 2023.analyze_data
17
The slide uses a combination of bar charts and a line chart to show trends, with a callout box for qualitative context.analyze_data
18
The table uses icons to represent different quantum technology segments (computing, communication, sensing).analyze_data
19
Includes a break in the x-axis for the United States bar to accommodate the significantly higher investment volume.analyze_data
20
McKinsey & Company slide 20. Data source: PitchBook.analyze_data
21
The slide uses a donut chart for overall distribution and a grouped bar chart for period-over-period comparison.analyze_data
22
The chart shows a clear trend of capital concentration in older cohorts.summarize
23
The slide uses a grid of cards to present qualitative and quantitative data on government investments.summarize
24
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show historical vs. new 2023 investments.analyze_data
25
The slide uses a map-based visualization to show global investment distribution, with callouts for specific country-level data.quantify_impact
27
McKinsey & Company branding present.size_opportunity
28
The slide uses a dark theme with icons representing the three technology segments.size_opportunity
29
The chart uses a dual-bar structure to compare two growth scenarios over time, with CAGR annotations.size_opportunity
30
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to represent economic value (Low/Medium/High) and a bar chart to represent value at stake in billions.size_opportunity
32
The slide uses a table format to categorize innovations by technology type, mechanism, and strategic implication.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Technological Breakthroughs
33
The slide uses a table format to categorize innovations by technology type, mechanism, and impact.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Technological Breakthroughs
35
The table includes a breakdown of Total QT, QC, QComm, and QS patents by country.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
36
The slide uses a dark mode aesthetic typical of McKinsey consulting decks. The table includes a callout box summarizing key insights.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
37
The chart shows a significant peak for one company (likely IBM) around 2019-2020 followed by a sharp decline.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
38
The chart tracks 10 specific entities over 7 years. The insights box summarizes the trend.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
39
The chart uses bubble size to represent total patent volume, while axes represent growth rates in different periods.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
40
Data source: Nature Index. Includes specific definitions for publication periods and quantum-relevant fields.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
41
The slide uses a dark theme with blue highlights for 2023 growth. Data is presented in two side-by-side tables.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Global Research and IP Landscape
42
QT stands for Quantum Technology. The chart highlights the EU's leading position in both total volume and density of graduates.quantify_impact
44
The slide uses a three-column layout for figures, news, and company data, with a footer for ecosystems.establish_context
48
Includes a specific footnote regarding the public investment figure.establish_context
49
The slide uses a three-column layout for key metrics and a bottom banner for ecosystem plans.summarize
50
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize data into Figures, Policies/News, and Companies, with a footer for Ecosystems.establish_context
51
Includes a list of recent policy milestones and a small table of quantum companies.establish_context
52
Not exhaustive; source includes PitchBook, Patsnap, and McKinsey analysis.establish_context
56
The slide uses a three-column layout for Figures, Policies, and Companies, with a footer for Ecosystems.establish_context
59
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize ecosystem data: Figures, Policies/News, and Companies, with a footer for hubs.establish_context
61
The diagram uses a central lightbulb icon connected to four industry-specific icons (finance, banking, computing, and corporate/infrastructure).transition
63
The slide uses a dark blue background with a light blue callout box for the definition of a quantum technology cluster.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
64
The slide uses a puzzle-piece visual metaphor to represent the interconnected nature of the stakeholders.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
65
The diagram uses a central hub labeled 'Key enablers' surrounded by six distinct categories.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
66
The slide uses a column-based framework to categorize ecosystem participants and provide regional examples.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Mece Breakdown
68
The table highlights the dominance of the US and Canada in the quantum computing ecosystem.analyze_data
69
The table is split into three columns of countries. Includes a footnote regarding data transparency for China and Japan.analyze_data
70
The chart shows cumulative growth, while the table shows annual breakdown by category.analyze_data
71
The chart uses a waterfall structure to aggregate segment counts into a total. Note 1 clarifies the count for Equipment/components.analyze_data
74
The slide uses an isometric illustration to explain the physical architecture of a quantum computer.present_framework
75
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast noise sources with mitigation strategies.diagnose
76
Includes expert perspectives on the difficulty of quantum control compared to classical control.frame_problem
77
The slide uses a structured list format to categorize challenges into two groups: 'Improve control performance' and 'Enable qubit scalability'.frame_problem
78
The slide uses a layered stack diagram to map software/middleware to hardware components, with callouts A, B, and C explaining the status of each layer.diagnose
79
The slide uses a three-part process flow: current state (breakthroughs), the user's dilemma (questions), and the solution (benchmarking).frame_problem
80
The slide uses a structured table format to categorize benchmarks and evaluate their utility for real-world application performance.compare_options
81
The slide uses a value chain diagram to define the scope of the proposed benchmarking initiative.recommend
82
The slide presents a framework for quantum computing benchmarking, referencing the QUARK framework.present_framework
83
The slide uses a color-coded heatmap to represent the readiness of different qubit technologies against specific engineering hurdles.compare_options
84
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare technology types, qubit counts, and company-specific roadmaps.present_framework
86
The slide uses a two-column layout to categorize updates into 'Commercial and policy' and 'Technology development', with a footer highlighting regional ecosystesummarize
87
The slide uses a timeline framework to map the progression of quantum communication technology against the quantum computing era.plan_implementation
88
The chart uses a logarithmic scale for physical qubit count and highlights a range of dates for potential susceptibility.quantify_impact
89
The table highlights a stagnation in the number of new QComm start-ups globally.analyze_data
90
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the composition of players, with a summary bar on the right and investment percentages at the bottom.analyze_data
92
Includes a quote from a professor at Boston University defining quantum sensing.present_solution
94
The slide uses a matrix structure to categorize potential industry impacts of Quantum Sensing technology.present_framework
95
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast industry adoption with academic progress.summarize
96
The data highlights a stagnation in the number of new start-ups across most countries, with the US and UK showing minor increases.analyze_data
97
The chart uses a waterfall-like structure to show segment counts and total, with percentages below.analyze_data
99
The slide uses a central upward arrow to visually represent growth/value creation.size_opportunity
100
The slide uses a central upward-pointing arrow to symbolize growth and synergy, flanked by two sets of three pillars representing specific challenges/solutions.present_solution
102
The slide details data sources (PitchBook), market sizing scenarios, and specific inclusion/exclusion criteria for defining the quantum technology player landscpresent_framework