Strategy& · consulting-deck
4th edition eReadiness 2023
83 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops
4th edition eReadiness 2023
Strategy& arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
1510152025303540455055606570758083
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 45 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 26 hits — 0/5 slides
40% 2/5 slides 40% 2/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides — 0/5 slides
Problem & Complication 15 slides 100% 15/15 slides 100% 15/15 slides · 92 hits — 0/15 slides
40% 6/15 slides 33.3% 5/15 slides 100% 15/15 slides 100% 15/15 slides Evidence & Proof 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 133 hits — 0/20 slides
45% 9/20 slides · 11 hits 10% 2/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides — 0/20 slides
Impact & Next Steps 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 21 hits — 0/5 slides
— 0/5 slides
40% 2/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides Slide inventory
83 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
03
The slide uses a timeline-based map visualization to show the growth of the study scope.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The map uses color-coding to distinguish between three geographic regions: North America (dark grey), EMEA (dark red), and APAC (pink).establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to define segments, their research focus, and expected outcomes.decompose_segments
09
Uses battery-shaped progress bars to visualize percentage data.decompose_segments
10
Consumer survey data with 12,816 respondents.analyze_data
11
The slide uses two stacked bar charts to compare commuting means and parking locations across three segments.analyze_data
12
The slide uses two stacked bar charts to visualize survey data from 12,816 and 5,772 respondents respectively.analyze_data
14
The slide uses a table format to compare five key metrics across four geographic regions.analyze_data
15
The slide uses a structured table format to compare five distinct metrics across four geographic regions.analyze_data
16
The slide uses two grouped bar charts to visualize consumer behavior regarding EV acquisition.analyze_data
17
Uses a funnel-like visualization for the customer journey and vertical gauge charts for NPS comparison.diagnose
18
Includes a central donut chart for overall intention and two bar charts for drivers and barriers.analyze_data
19
The slide uses a three-part structure to map the customer journey from consideration to loyalty.analyze_data
20
The slide uses two stacked bar charts to contrast high satisfaction rates with significant churn risk in North America.analyze_data
21
The slide uses a dual bar chart layout to contrast positive drivers and negative issues, with a dot-plot legend at the bottom for regional breakdown.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
22
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts and a grouped bar chart to visualize consumer survey data regarding EV incentives.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
23
The chart uses a waterfall-like structure to show the total population (100%) split into bundled (37%), independent (23%), and no purchase (40%).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
24
The slide uses a bar chart to rank purchasing factors and a stacked bar chart with a slider graphic to show incentive usage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
25
The chart combines bar and line elements to show satisfaction levels across different installation management scenarios.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
26
The data is based on 84 respondents identified as 'detractors'.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
27
The chart displays 7 categories of products/services, each with 3 regional data points.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
28
The chart uses battery-shaped stacked bar segments to represent charging locations.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
29
The slide uses two charts: a grouped bar chart for charging frequency and a stacked bar chart for energy source.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
30
Includes data on charging power, tariff types, loyalty, and decision drivers.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
31
The 2x2 matrix highlights 'High-priority issues' in the bottom-right quadrant (High Importance, Low Satisfaction).diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
32
Includes three distinct charts: two bar-stacked charts by age and one bar-stacked chart by country.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
33
The chart highlights 'Maintenance plan' as the focus of the next slide.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
34
The slide presents two bar charts side-by-side based on consumer survey data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
35
The chart uses a combination of bar charts for the average and dot plots for regional data points (APAC, EMEA, North America).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
36
The slide uses a comparative bar chart structure to highlight differences in consumer behavior and attitudes toward vehicle economics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
37
SoH stands for State of Health. Data is segmented by APAC, EMEA, and North America.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
38
Survey of 778 respondents. SoH = State of Health.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
39
The chart uses a grouped bar chart format with regional averages indicated by dashed lines.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
40
The slide uses a color-coded system where red text indicates specific regional data points.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
42
The slide uses a color-coded bar chart approach within a table structure to visualize survey data.analyze_data
43
The slide uses a heatmap-style bar chart representation within a table structure to visualize survey data from 7,930 respondents.analyze_data
45
Uses a combination of bar charts, bubble charts, and gauge charts to profile six distinct consumer segments.present_framework
46
The slide uses a combination of big numbers for key attributes and line charts to show distribution differences between the target segment and the broader EV owaudience_persona
47
The slide uses a combination of a persona-style list and comparative line charts to illustrate the 'Dreamer' segment.present_framework
48
Uses a combination of icons, metrics, and line charts to define a specific persona.audience_persona
49
Uses a combination of icons, metric gauges, and line charts to compare two segments.analyze_data
50
The chart highlights 'Top 3 drivers' (Cost, Convenience, Environment) with a shaded background area.analyze_data
51
The slide uses grouped bar charts to visualize survey data from 7,930 respondents.analyze_data
52
The chart displays 11 price brackets across 3 regions, totaling 33 data points plus a cumulative summary box.analyze_data
53
The chart uses a combination of aggregate bars and regional data points (dots) to show variance across geographies.analyze_data
54
The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare three regions across 12 distinct barrier categories.diagnose
55
The slide uses a dual-axis approach with bars for individual segments and a line for cumulative percentages.analyze_data
56
The chart uses a combination of bar charts for the average and dot plots for regional variations.analyze_data
57
The slide uses a background image of gas pump nozzles to visually reinforce the 'sceptic' theme.transition
58
The slide uses a table format to compare five specific metrics across four geographic regions.analyze_data
59
The slide uses a heatmap-style bar chart representation within a table structure to visualize survey data from 4,108 respondents.analyze_data
60
The chart displays 16 categories of rejection reasons, each with three bars representing the three regions.diagnose
62
The slide uses a column-based framework to categorize the 14 KPIs.present_framework
63
The chart displays a descending ranking of countries based on an eReadiness index score.compare_peers
64
The table uses a 1-5 scale and includes directional arrows indicating performance change vs 2022.compare_peers
65
The slide uses a matrix-style layout to compare country performance across specific drivers of eReadiness.compare_peers
66
The slide uses a structured table to define a scoring methodology for EV incentives.present_framework
67
The slide uses battery icons to represent incentive levels (1-5 scale) and arrows to indicate year-over-year trends.compare_peers
68
The slide uses a battery-level visual metaphor to represent scores from 1 (low) to 5 (high).compare_options
69
The slide defines a scoring methodology (1 to 5 scale) for four specific infrastructure-related KPIs.present_framework
70
The slide uses a battery-icon visual metaphor to represent scores from 1 to 5.compare_peers
71
The slide uses battery icons as visual representations of data values (1-5 scale).compare_peers
72
The slide defines a scoring framework (1-5 scale) for three specific metrics related to EV supply.present_framework
73
The slide uses a battery icon metaphor to represent scores from 1 to 5.compare_peers
74
The slide uses a battery icon metaphor to represent scores from 1 (low) to 5 (high).quantify_impact
75
The slide uses a structured table format to define three specific KPIs: Willingness to buy, Share of short distance drivers, and Household income.present_framework
76
The slide uses a battery icon metaphor to represent scores from 1 to 5.compare_peers
77
The slide uses battery icons as a visual metaphor for scoring (1-5 scale).present_solution
79
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map recommendations to stakeholders (OEMs, Retailers, Utility/CPO).recommend
80
This is the second of two slides detailing recommendations. The table uses 'X' marks to indicate which stakeholders (OEMs, Retailers, Utility/CPO, Public Authorrecommend
81
The slide uses a dark background with a large, stylized ampersand watermark.other