Education: 2023 M&A Deal Roundup and Trends to Watch Out for in 2024

L.E.K.
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

1
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 57 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 57 slides 100% 57/57 slides 100% 57/57 slides · 353 hits
0/57 slides
47.4% 27/57 slides · 29 hits 31.6% 18/57 slides
0/57 slides
12.3% 7/57 slides

Slide inventory

57
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
04
summarize
05
summarize
06
Includes a dual-axis chart with stacked bars for transaction counts and a line chart for global volume, plus a data table for CAGR and average values.analyze_data
07
The slide uses a combination of bar charts for quarterly data and a line chart for the moving average, heavily annotated with text boxes explaining historical tanalyze_data
08
Includes a stacked bar chart of deal sizes and a table of CAGR by segment, plus a logo grid of mega-deals.analyze_data
09
Includes a CAGR table for 2017-20 and 2020-23 periods.analyze_data
10
The chart includes a table at the bottom showing USD deal values for Corporate and Private Equity segments.analyze_data
11
The chart uses a stacked bar format to compare market composition by subsector.analyze_data
12
Includes a stacked bar chart for regional market share and a table for CAGR analysis.analyze_data
13
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show deal value distribution by size and a table for CAGR and deal volume counts.analyze_data
14
The chart shows a shift in bidder composition over time, with corporate bidders increasing their share in 2023.analyze_data
15
Includes CAGR data for 2017-20 and 2020-23. Mentions specific major acquisitions.analyze_data
16
summarize
17
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke layout to present six distinct trends.summarize
18
The slide uses a logo-grid layout to categorize education companies into three segments: Global providers, North American education providers, and Rest of the wsummarize
19
The slide uses a timeline-style navigation on the left to indicate this is the first of three slides covering different regions.establish_context
20
The slide uses a vertical navigation bar on the left to indicate the current focus is on Europe, with a non-exhaustive list of companies.establish_context
21
The slide uses a timeline-like visual on the left to highlight Asia-Pacific as the focus region.illustrate_case
22
Slide contains three distinct charts: a stacked bar chart on skill disruption, a horizontal bar chart on workforce strategy focus, and a horizontal bar chart onsummarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide uses two horizontal bar charts to contrast growth-driving technology adoption against declining job roles.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The slide uses a simple three-column layout to present pain points.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The slide uses a numbered list format to present five distinct training provider models.present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
26
The slide uses a three-column framework to segment the market of outcome-oriented training providers.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
27
The slide categorizes providers into 'Proprietary' (e.g., PMI, Axelos, ACAMS) and 'Affiliated' (e.g., Eruditus, XED, Pluralsight, Global Alumni).present_solution
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
28
The slide uses a bar chart to show market growth and a logo grid to illustrate the competitive landscape.establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
29
The slide uses a horizontal axis to represent 'Training complexity' as a proxy for job role sophistication.establish_context
30
The slide uses a green color scheme consistent with L.E.K. branding.summarize
31
Includes L.E.K. branding and multiple data sources.analyze_data
32
The slide uses a three-column layout to segment safety strategies.present_solution
33
The slide highlights key government spending initiatives in the US and UK for student safety and mental health.quantify_impact
34
The slide uses a table-like structure to map categories to descriptions and logos.present_framework
35
Includes three distinct charts: a bar chart for tool usage growth, a stacked bar chart for tool categories, and a grouped bar chart for digital strategy adoptiosummarize
36
The slide uses two distinct chart types to illustrate learning loss: a bar chart showing loss in school years and a grouped bar chart showing absolute test scordiagnose
37
The slide uses a logo-grid to illustrate market players across the identified sectors.illustrate_case
38
The slide uses a three-column layout to present specific deal examples.illustrate_case
39
The slide uses a bar chart to show industry spending and a list of icons/text to explain the 'why' behind the low education spend.diagnose
40
The slide uses a bar chart to rank education segments by their expected disruption level from AI, with specific callouts for high and low impact areas.summarize
41
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize trends, each paired with relevant company logos and descriptive bullet points.summarize
42
The slide uses a three-column layout to present distinct case studies.illustrate_case
43
The slide uses a three-row comparison structure to highlight trends and company-specific case studies.summarize
44
The slide highlights specific investment deals as examples of global interest in Indian edtech.illustrate_case
45
front_matter
46
The slide uses a grid layout to categorize companies by funding vintage and scale, serving as a pipeline for future investment opportunities.size_opportunity
47
The slide uses a matrix-like layout to organize company logos by education subsegment.decompose_segments
48
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to map companies to specific education service subsegments.present_framework
49
The slide uses a custom matrix/grid layout to categorize companies by edtech subsegment.present_framework
50
The chart uses a custom grid layout to segment companies based on funding and scale. Total assets = 59.prioritize
51
The slide uses a grid-based matrix to categorize companies by geography and sector. It is a non-exhaustive landscape.present_framework
52
The chart uses a custom matrix layout to segment companies based on funding and scale.prioritize
53
The chart uses a grid layout to categorize companies by subsegment and geography, with counts per row and column.decompose_segments
54
The chart uses a custom matrix layout to segment companies based on funding and scale. It includes a total count of 45 assets.prioritize
55
The slide uses a 2D matrix (region vs funding) to categorize edtech assets.present_framework
57
This is a standard corporate boilerplate slide.other