McKinsey · consulting-deck
Grocery profitability outlook –Europe
53 pages · 4 arc beats · 3 loops
Grocery profitability outlook –Europe
McKinsey arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
124681012141618202224262830323436384042444648505253
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 45 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Problem 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 32 hits 100% 5/5 slides — 0/5 slides
40% 2/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides — 0/5 slides
Agitate 9 slides 100% 9/9 slides 100% 9/9 slides · 66 hits 66.7% 6/9 slides 66.7% 6/9 slides · 7 hits 33.3% 3/9 slides 100% 9/9 slides 11.1% 1/9 slides Solution 16 slides 100% 16/16 slides 100% 16/16 slides · 127 hits 75% 12/16 slides 43.8% 7/16 slides · 8 hits 31.3% 5/16 slides 100% 16/16 slides 81.3% 13/16 slides Action 15 slides 100% 15/15 slides 100% 15/15 slides · 93 hits 86.7% 13/15 slides 26.7% 4/15 slides 40% 6/15 slides 100% 15/15 slides — 0/15 slides
Slide inventory
53 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
04
The slide uses a chronological flow (Looking back, Outlook, Solutions) to frame the industry problem.summarize
05
The chart highlights specific economic periods: Pre-COVID/post bank crisis, COVID, and Inflation.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
06
The slide uses a waterfall-style table structure to compare P&L line items between two retail segments.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
07
The chart highlights a performance gap of 4.4% between the highest and lowest performing grocers.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
08
The slide uses a combination of bar charts for margin comparison and a multi-line chart for revenue/volume trends.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
09
The slide uses a decomposition framework to show how sales and floor space drive sales density.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem
10
The slide uses a categorization framework to split drivers into Macroeconomic and Industry dynamics.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
11
The slide highlights the divergence in margin performance between traditional grocery formats and discounters.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
12
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to explain margin compression despite inflationary pressures.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
13
The chart uses a diagonal line to represent parity between gross margin change and EBITDA margin change, with shaded regions indicating performance relative to analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
14
The slide uses a four-column layout to present specific case examples, each accompanied by a supporting quote from company leadership.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
15
The slide uses a three-column layout to compare different corporate strategies for cost restructuring.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
16
The slide uses a chronological/logical flow (Past, Future, Action) to frame the industry challenge.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
17
The slide uses a two-column layout to present six distinct drivers of margin pressure.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Agitate
18
The slide uses a range-based impact visualization for each trend.quantify_impact
19
The slide uses a two-part structure: a line chart showing job vacancy trends and a bar chart showing ECB inflation projections.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
McKinsey & Company slide, page 20. Includes detailed footnotes on methodology for low/high case projections.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The chart highlights that historical cost optimization is insufficient to offset the projected trend impact, pushing margins toward the 2-4% range, which is cloquantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
Uses a linear process flow structure to connect past, future, and recommended actions.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide uses a numbered list format to present a comprehensive strategic roadmap. Icons represent the three main pillars.present_solution
24
The slide uses a waterfall chart to show how negative trends erode EBITDA and how specific operational levers can recover it.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
25
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure to highlight two distinct strategies for fresh quality.illustrate_case
26
The chart uses a bridge-style visualization to show the delta between 2023 and 2029 metrics.quantify_impact
27
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure to contrast the two retailers' private label approaches.illustrate_case
28
The chart is a waterfall-style bridge showing the transition from 2023 to 2029.quantify_impact
29
The slide uses a bar chart to show the shift from standalone Argos stores to in-store Argos locations.illustrate_case
30
The slide uses a clear structure to define the strategic approach (context) and the specific use cases for personalized promotions.illustrate_case
31
The chart uses a bridge-like structure to show the delta between 2023 and 2029 financials.quantify_impact
32
The slide uses a staircase metaphor to represent increasing complexity.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
33
The slide uses a dark blue sidebar for the main thesis and a white background for the supporting table.recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Solution
34
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the impact of labor cost reduction on EBITDA.quantify_impact
35
The slide uses a robotic arm illustration to emphasize the theme of automation.quantify_impact
36
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast store-level and warehouse-level automation impacts.quantify_impact
37
The slide uses a side-by-side comparison structure to highlight two distinct case studies.illustrate_case
38
The chart uses a waterfall-like logic to show the impact of retail media on revenue, operating expenses, and EBITDA between 2023 and 2029.quantify_impact
39
The slide uses a horizontal arrow timeline to segment the company's growth phases.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
40
The slide uses a circular ecosystem diagram to map various business units (Stores, Marketplace, Social, Advertising, Logistics, Home services, Entertainment, Heillustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Action
42
The slide uses two bar charts to illustrate trends in consumer behavior post-COVID.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
43
The chart uses broken axes (indicated by squiggly lines) for the consumption data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
45
The chart highlights a total growth of 3.8 percentage points, with specific contributions of +2.0pp from discounters and +1.8pp from super/hypermarkets.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
46
The chart shows a stacked bar representation of offline (light blue) and online (dark blue) grocery sales in EUR B.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Action
47
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to compare two scenarios: 100% pass-through vs 90% pass-through.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action
48
The slide uses a comparative P&L structure to demonstrate sensitivity of EBITDA margin to labor cost pass-through rates.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action
49
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show P&L impact from 2023 to 2029 under low and high adoption cases.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action
50
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show P&L development under two scenarios (Low case vs High case).quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action
51
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show how changes in volume share, revenue, COGS, and OPEX lead to a 0.2pp EBITDA margin increase.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action
52
The slide uses a heatmap matrix to visualize the impact of two variables on EBITDA margin.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action