Forecasting a Realistic Electricity Infrastructure Buildout for Medium- & Heavy-Duty Battery Electric Vehicles

Roland Berger
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

16
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes Roland Berger branding and date.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
The slide uses a numbered list format to present six key findings regarding infrastructure investment costs and grid requirements.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The slide uses a structured table to decompose the total investment cost across different charging segments.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
05
The slide uses a combination of bar charts for technology distribution and summary metrics for investment costs.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
06
Includes a duty cycle visualization, a calculation of charging needs, and a cost estimate for utility upgrades.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
07
The slide uses a three-part structure (I, II, III) to build a case for why utility costs are a barrier to fleet electrification.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The slide uses a combination of a data table for class-specific requirements and bar charts for mileage distribution to justify the $69B investment figure.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide uses a 'before-after' or 'tension' framing to highlight the conflict between infrastructure requirements and investment viability.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide uses a map to illustrate the simulated network and a breakdown of charge points per location type (rural vs metro) to justify the total investment figsize_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide highlights the financial burden of MDHD vehicle charging on the distribution grid and suggests demand management as a mitigation strategy.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
MDHD likely stands for Medium-Duty/Heavy-Duty vehicles.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
13
MDHD stands for Medium-Duty/Heavy-Duty vehicles. The table is split into Generation and Capacity sections.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
14
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the total vehicle population (7.9M) and a table to define the four segments.segmentation
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
15
The slide uses a matrix structure to delineate scope (in-scope vs not-in-scope) and categorize infrastructure components.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
16
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps