PwC Women in Work 2025

PwC
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 5 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

50
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
Includes a pull-quote and a key metric (69 points).summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · So What Cascade
03
PwC Women in Work 2025 report slide.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · So What Cascade
04
PwC Women in Work 2025 report slide.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · So What Cascade
05
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
07
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
09
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
10
The slide highlights a 13-point increase in the index score and provides a detailed table of five indicators with year-over-year changes.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Benchmark Gap
11
The chart uses a grouped bar approach to show year-over-year changes for each country.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Benchmark Gap
12
The table provides a granular breakdown of performance changes across five indicators plus an index score, segmented by time periods (2011-2023, 2011-2019, 2020analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Benchmark Gap
13
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
14
Includes a data table comparing 2022 and 2023 metrics for OECD averages and UK-specific values.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Zoom In
15
Includes a timeline projection for closing the gap.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Zoom In
16
The slide uses a line chart to compare four distinct demographic/geographic segments over time.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Zoom In
17
Includes a timeline-based data table showing UK and OECD participation gaps across five career stages.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Zoom In
18
The slide uses a choropleth map combined with callout boxes to show 2022 vs 2023 rankings for 12 UK regions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Zoom In
19
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
20
The chart shows a dual-axis trend line comparing GDP per hour worked (solid lines) and WiW Index (dashed lines) from 2011 to 2023.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Hypothesis Test
21
Includes a scatter plot showing trends over time and a key metric callout for 2023 UK performance.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Hypothesis Test
22
The slide uses a process-flow layout to describe the econometric steps.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Hypothesis Test
23
The slide uses a causal chain framework to link female participation rate to productivity change.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Hypothesis Test
24
Includes a map of the UK and a summary table of productivity and GDP impacts.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork
25
Includes a map of the UK and specific impact metrics for UK, OECD, and G7.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork
26
The slide uses a combination of a map, big numbers, and a data table to illustrate the economic impact of closing the gender participation gap.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork
27
transition
28
Includes a disclosure regarding the binary treatment of gender and sex due to data limitations.front_matter
29
The slide explains why the 2022 rankings were updated after the initial 2024 report publication.analyze_data
30
present_framework
31
summarize
32
Includes a bar chart comparing 2021/2022 rankings and a data table for 2023 metrics.analyze_data
33
The slide uses a combination of qualitative country-specific insights and a quantitative summary table to explain index rankings.analyze_data
34
Includes a data table comparing 5 indicators plus the index score for three regions.summarize
35
The slide provides a comparative analysis of three specific UK regions, highlighting their performance on the Women in Work Index.analyze_data
36
The slide uses a sequential process flow to map life stages to career impacts.present_framework
37
Part of a multi-stage framework; this is the continuation slide.present_framework
38
The slide outlines a quantitative research methodology involving literature review, impact pathway identification, data collection, panel regression, impact estpresent_framework
40
The slide uses a causal chain structure to link specific labor market indicators to productivity outcomes.diagnose
41
The slide uses a table to map specific indicators to their impact channels and supporting academic/institutional findings.summarize
42
The slide provides a structured literature review mapping specific indicators to impact channels and key research findings.summarize
43
The slide presents three scenarios: historical improvement (2011-2023), equating participation, and future progress (2011-2030).quantify_impact
44
The table presents data for three metrics (productivity, GDP per hour, total GDP) across three scenarios (2011-2023 improvement, equating participation, and 201quantify_impact
45
The table shows regression coefficients for various economic indicators across four model specifications.analyze_data
46
Part of a series of model sensitivity analyses.analyze_data
47
cite_precedent
48
cite_precedent
50
Standard PwC corporate contact/disclaimer slide.other