PEOPLE AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Ipsos
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 5
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

1
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 69 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 69 slides 100% 69/69 slides 100% 69/69 slides · 386 hits
0/69 slides
40.6% 28/69 slides · 30 hits 5.8% 4/69 slides
0/69 slides
0/69 slides

Slide inventory

69
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
front_matter
03
summarize
04
front_matter
05
transition
06
The chart shows a clear upward trend in global temperatures, with 2024 highlighted as exceeding the 1.5C target.establish_context
07
Ipsos Earth Day 2025 survey data point.summarize
08
The slide uses a three-column layout with a right-hand callout box.summarize
09
The chart displays a negative trend across all listed countries, with Japan showing the largest decline.analyze_data
10
The chart uses a diverging bar structure to compare 'Agree' (green) and 'Disagree' (purple) sentiments across countries, with historical data columns for 2024 aanalyze_data
11
The chart uses a 2x2 matrix structure to segment countries based on two attitudinal dimensions.compare_peers
12
The slide uses a mix of narrative text and a prominent callout metric.summarize
13
The slide uses a dramatic photo of a wildfire to anchor the discussion on climate risk perception.establish_context
14
The slide uses a three-column layout with a prominent callout metric on the right.summarize
15
The chart includes a trend line indicating the positive correlation between the two variables.quantify_impact
16
The slide highlights a tension between optimism about environmental benefits and apathy driven by financial concerns.summarize
17
The quote highlights the risk of reaching climate tipping points.establish_context
18
The slide highlights a gap between actual progress (17% on track) and public perception.summarize
19
The text appears to be a summary of survey findings regarding public knowledge of global sustainability metrics.summarize
20
The chart compares 'Right answer' (actual data) with '% who answered correctly' (public perception).analyze_data
21
The slide contrasts the warning from Allianz board member Günther Thallinger with the current political climate and specific news headlines regarding ESG.summarize
22
The background image depicts a flood, visually reinforcing the urgency of the climate message.summarize
23
The chart shows a downward trend in agreement that businesses are failing employees/customers if they don't act on climate change.analyze_data
24
The chart is a semi-circle pie chart representing consumer segments.present_framework
25
The slide uses a two-column layout: findings on the left, actionable recommendations on the right.recommend
26
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
27
state_next_steps
28
transition
29
transition
30
The chart displays a '32-Country Average' followed by individual country data sorted by the 'Agree' percentage.analyze_data
31
The chart displays data for three age segments: Under 35, 50-74, and 35-49.analyze_data
32
The chart displays a 32-country average followed by individual country data, sorted by the 'Agree' percentage.analyze_data
33
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under 75.analyze_data
34
The chart uses a diverging bar format to show 'Agree' vs 'Disagree' for the current year, with a table for historical context.analyze_data
35
The chart compares current agreement levels against historical data from 2024 and 2023.analyze_data
36
The chart is sorted by the 'Agree' percentage in descending order.analyze_data
37
The chart uses a trend line to illustrate the correlation across 32 countries.analyze_data
38
The chart displays a ranking of countries by concern level, with a secondary column for a 22-country average comparison.analyze_data
39
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries.analyze_data
40
transition
41
Data source: Ipsos | People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
42
The data is sorted in descending order of agreement, with a 32-country average at the top.analyze_data
43
Data source: Ipsos | People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries.analyze_data
44
Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries, interviewed between 24 January and 7 February 2025.analyze_data
45
The data is sorted in descending order of agreement, with the 32-country average at the top.analyze_data
46
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries.analyze_data
47
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries.analyze_data
48
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries.compare_peers
49
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
50
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults under the age of 75 across 32 countries.analyze_data
51
transition
52
The chart displays survey results categorized by perceived progress levels (About 70%, About half, About a fifth, Less than 5%).analyze_data
53
The chart displays survey results from 23,745 adults. The data represents public opinion rather than actual e-waste statistics.analyze_data
54
The chart displays survey data across 32 countries, with a 32-country average at the top.analyze_data
55
The chart displays survey results where respondents estimated the proportion of species threatened with extinction. The 'Correct answer' is highlighted in the sanalyze_data
56
front_matter
57
The slide uses a bar chart format to compare positive and negative sentiment percentages, with a calculated difference column.quantify_impact
58
Data source: Ipsos | People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
59
The chart displays a dual-bar structure for each country, showing positive impact (green) and negative impact (purple).analyze_data
60
The chart uses a diverging bar structure to show positive vs negative impact percentages.analyze_data
61
The chart displays a 32-country average followed by individual country data, sorted by positive impact percentage.analyze_data
62
Data source: Ipsos People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
63
Data source: Ipsos | People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
64
Data source: Ipsos | People and Climate Change 2025. Base: 23,745 adults.analyze_data
65
The chart displays 32 countries ranked by positive impact percentage. Each country has a corresponding negative impact percentage.analyze_data
66
Data source: Ipsos | People and Climate Change 2025analyze_data
68
Standard Ipsos methodology disclosure slide.appendix