Attitudes towards a global plastic pollution treaty

Ipsos
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

33
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes logos for WWF, Plastic Free Foundation, and Ipsos.front_matter
02
The slide uses a chronological timeline structure to summarize the history of the research project.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
The slide presents four key metrics as big numbers with supporting icons and text.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
Data from Ipsos Global Advisor survey of 23,029 adults across 34 countries.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
Two stacked bar charts showing agreement levels and importance ratings for various plastic treaty measures.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
07
The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 73% agreement on average.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
08
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show the distribution of agreement levels across different regions.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
09
The chart displays percentages for 'Strongly agree', 'Agree', 'Neither agree nor disagree', 'Disagree/Strongly disagree', and 'Don't know'.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
10
The chart shows a stacked bar representation of survey responses ranging from 'Strongly agree' to 'Don't know'.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
11
The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 68% of respondents agreeing.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
12
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of agreement levels across different global regions.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
13
The chart displays the percentage of respondents who strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree/strongly disagree, or don't know.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
14
The chart displays survey results across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 5-point Likert scale.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
15
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Golden Circle
16
Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent survey responses ranging from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 85% of respondents viewing such bans as important.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
Data represents a survey of 24,727 online adults across 32 countries.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
The chart shows a high level of global consensus, with 90% of respondents viewing the ban as important.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The chart displays survey data across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 6-point sentiment scale.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The chart uses a stacked bar format to represent survey responses ranging from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The chart shows a high level of global consensus on the importance of re-use and refill systems, with most countries showing over 80% support.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the distribution of sentiment across different regions.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Survey of 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The chart displays survey data across 7 regional/grouping categories with a 6-point Likert scale.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
Data source: Ipsos Global Advisor. Base: 24,727 online adults aged 16-74 in 32 countries.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer
29
The chart displays survey results across 7 regions/groupings, showing the percentage breakdown of sentiment from 'Essential' to 'Don't know'.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer
30
The chart shows a high level of global consensus on the importance of manufacturer-funded waste management.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer
31
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to represent survey responses across 7 regional categories.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Voice Of Customer
32
Standard Ipsos methodology disclosure slide.appendix
33
Standard corporate profile slide.summarize