What if all vehicles were electric?

BCG
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

11
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
02
The slide uses the CASE (Connected, Autonomous, Shared, Electric) framework, though 'Shared' is grouped with 'Connectivity'.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · AttentionLoop · Why Now
03
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show the composition of vehicle production over time, with a specific breakdown of xEV types for the year 2020.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Why Now
04
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize drivers of EV adoption.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Why Now
05
The chart uses a line graph to illustrate the convergence of TCO for various powertrain technologies over time.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · NeedLoop · Why Now
06
The slide uses a dual-column layout: left side for qualitative evidence (quotes) and right side for quantitative evidence (bar chart).illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
The chart uses a dual-axis approach: bars represent volume/composition, while the line represents the total electrification percentage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
Includes 5-year CAGR data for powertrain segments below each chart.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · SatisfactionLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
Uses a traffic light system to diagnose industry health across five value chain segments.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Action
10
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Action
11
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Action