Projecting US Mail volumes to 2020

BCG
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

41
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
transition
03
The slide defines the 'Base Case' as a business-as-usual scenario and lists the specific assumptions and research methods used to build it.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The slide uses a two-column layout to map specific actions to their corresponding details.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast mail segments.decompose_segments
06
The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to visualize volume distribution across multiple dimensions.analyze_data
07
transition
08
The slide uses a structured table format to present forecast data alongside qualitative drivers.analyze_data
09
The chart uses a BCG-branded green background. It highlights a -1.5% annual decline rate.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
BCG slide, likely part of a postal service strategy deck.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart uses two different forecast lines (Sender vs Consumer perspective) and a worst-case benchmark from the EU.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The chart uses a BCG-branded background. The data points represent 'Pieces (B)'.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The chart uses a Marimekko layout to show volume distribution across segments, with color-coded arrows indicating growth/decline outlooks.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
14
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a market trend.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
15
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
16
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to correlate broadband adoption with declining mail volumes across international postal services.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
17
The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.analyze_data
18
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now
19
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now
20
The matrix uses a color-coded gradient to indicate likelihood, with the base case highlighted.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now
21
The slide uses a color-coded arrow system (green up, red down) to denote positive and negative trends for the USPS.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now
22
The slide uses a two-by-two style layout to contrast conventional vs. structural interventions.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Why Now
23
summarize
24
BCG branded slide, likely part of a restructuring or turnaround strategy deck.state_next_steps
25
transition
26
The chart illustrates the net impact of growth factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth) and diversion factors (Autopay, Online/Mobile presentment) on total volumequantify_impact
27
The chart shows a starting volume of 14.4B in 2009, with various positive and negative drivers leading to an 11.0B volume in 2020.quantify_impact
28
The chart shows a starting volume of 8.5B in 2009 and an ending volume of 4.5B in 2020, with various positive and negative drivers in between.quantify_impact
29
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the net impact of various market drivers on payment volume.quantify_impact
30
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how various factors (rebound, growth, targeting, migration, online, email) bridge the gap between 2009 and 2020 volquantify_impact
31
The chart illustrates a volume increase from 32.1B to 38.0B, driven by various factors including organic growth, shifts from First Class, and online targeting.quantify_impact
32
The chart illustrates a bridge from 23.7B to 26.2B volume.quantify_impact
33
The chart uses a waterfall structure to decompose the net change in volume between two points in time.quantify_impact
34
transition
35
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for service improvements.quantify_impact
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for improvement drivers.analyze_data
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores.quantify_impact
38
Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for online advertising improvements.quantify_impact
39
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.quantify_impact
40
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.quantify_impact
41
BCG logo present. Internet survey, n=1736.analyze_data