Lazard · consulting-deck
Lazards Lcoeplus
57 pages · 0 arc beats · 0 loops
Lazards Lcoeplus
Lazard arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 0 LOOPS
1246810121416182022242628303234363840424446485052545657
Deck intelligence map
1 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 57 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Whole deck 57 slides 100% 57/57 slides 100% 57/57 slides · 312 hits — 0/57 slides
35.1% 20/57 slides · 22 hits 14% 8/57 slides — 0/57 slides
— 0/57 slides
Slide inventory
57 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
04
This is the introductory page of the Lazard LCOE report, setting the stage for the subsequent data-heavy slides.establish_context
05
The chart uses a range-based bar format to show cost variability for different energy sources.compare_peers
06
The chart uses a grouped bar structure to show unsubsidized vs. subsidized costs for different energy sources.quantify_impact
07
The chart uses a tornado-style bar representation to show the range of LCOE values for different energy sources.analyze_data
08
Lazard LCOE v16.0 analysis showing unsubsidized vs carbon-priced costs.analyze_data
09
The chart uses a scatter plot with trend lines to show the sensitivity of LCOE to capital costs across different energy sources.analyze_data
10
The chart uses a split-bar design to distinguish between unsubsidized and subsidized LCOE for renewables, and marginal costs for conventional sources.compare_peers
11
The chart breaks down costs into unsubsidized LCOE, subsidized LCOE, and firming costs, with supporting metrics for ELCC, capacity factor, and resource penetratanalyze_data
12
The chart tracks LCOE values in $/MWh across different Lazard LCOE report versions.analyze_data
14
The chart uses solid bars for most technologies and dashed/shaded bars for Geothermal, Nuclear, and Coal to indicate limited public/observable data sets.compare_options
15
The chart breaks down LCOE into four cost components for different energy sources, highlighting the cost competitiveness of renewables.analyze_data
16
The chart categorizes technologies into Renewable Energy and Conventional, showing stacked horizontal bars for each.analyze_data
17
The slide uses a checkmark/cross matrix to categorize energy technologies by their operational and environmental attributes.compare_options
19
Includes a disclaimer regarding factors not covered in the analysis.establish_context
20
The slide uses a structured table to define the scope of the LCOS analysis.establish_context
21
The table uses a formulaic approach to calculate annual and project MWh based on storage duration, cycles, and days of operation.analyze_data
22
The chart uses a dual-axis scale for the bottom-most residential categories due to significantly higher costs.compare_peers
23
The chart uses a split x-axis scale to accommodate the wide range of costs between utility-scale and residential storage.compare_options
24
The table uses checkmarks to indicate applicability of specific revenue streams to different storage configurations.compare_options
25
The slide uses a table to segment energy storage applications into two primary categories: In-Front-of-the-Meter and Behind-the-Meter.illustrate_case
26
The slide uses a map to anchor specific project parameters (MW/MWh) to geographic locations.illustrate_case
27
The slide uses stacked bar charts to represent revenue components and callout boxes for IRR percentages.analyze_data
30
The slide uses a table-like structure to categorize key insights into four thematic areas.summarize
31
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to show demand growth and a text-based framework to explain hydrogen color coding.establish_context
32
The chart uses a floating bar format to represent cost ranges for different hydrogen production technologies.analyze_data
33
The chart compares unsubsidized and subsidized LCOE for gas peaking plants with a 25% hydrogen blend against a reference gas peaking plant at 0% hydrogen blend analyze_data
36
This slide serves as an introductory overview and disclosure page for a section on maturing technologies.front_matter
38
The slide uses a structured table format to categorize key insights into four thematic areas.summarize
39
Uses Lazard's LCOE v16.0 data; compares unsubsidized vs subsidized costs.analyze_data
42
The slide uses a structured table format to categorize key insights into four thematic areas.summarize
44
The chart uses a floating bar chart style to show cost ranges for unsubsidized, subsidized, and subsidized with domestic content adder scenarios.compare_options
46
The slide uses a complex financial table to demonstrate how LCOE is derived by solving for the $/MWh value that equates levered IRR to the cost of equity.present_framework
47
Data presented in ranges for Low Case and High Case scenarios across four solar PV categories.analyze_data
50
This is a continuation slide from a Lazard LCOE report, focusing on operating assets.analyze_data
52
The slide uses a financial model structure to demonstrate how LCOS is derived from operational and capital assumptions.present_framework
53
The table provides a comprehensive breakdown of parameters including power rating, duration, capital costs, O&M, tax credits, and efficiency for eight differentanalyze_data
55
The slide details the financial model inputs and outputs, including capital structure, tax assumptions, and cash flow calculations.present_framework
56
The table provides a comparative view of Low Case and High Case scenarios for different hydrogen production methods.analyze_data
57
The table compares Low Case and High Case scenarios across four technology/source combinations.analyze_data