Indonesia case study

BCG
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 3 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 5
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

69
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
Includes a comparative bar chart of GDP spent on education across several countries.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
Includes specific data on school connectivity, investment figures ($168M, $20/student, $4,450/school), and a breakdown of funding/operating strategies.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide uses a three-part narrative structure to connect geography, infrastructure, and education outcomes.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
07
The slide uses a map of Indonesia with regional data tables and a sidebar of national-level metrics.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
09
The slide uses three distinct chart types to illustrate regional economic disparities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
10
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to show the relationship between population density (left) and school distribution/type (right).analyze_data
11
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare connectivity levels across countries and includes three specific quotes/data points from the Ministry of Educationframe_problem
12
Uses a combination of bar charts to establish context (high national access) and a horizontal bar chart to show regional disparities in school electrification.frame_problem
13
The slide uses two horizontal bar charts to correlate signal strength with proximity to infrastructure nodes.analyze_data
14
The slide uses a map to visualize the geographic disparity in school internet connectivity, supported by specific statistics from MECRT.diagnose
15
illustrate_case
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
16
The slide uses a hierarchical flow diagram to illustrate the relationship between central, provincial, and city/district governments.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
17
front_matter
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
18
The charts use a waterfall-like distribution of countries to show Indonesia's position relative to the ITU 2% affordability threshold.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
19
Uses two choropleth maps to highlight digital infrastructure gaps.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
20
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts and a table to map connectivity status to specific investment needs.frame_problem
Open slide detailLoop · Zoom In
21
front_matter
22
establish_context
23
Focuses on JSO, state budget allocation, spectrum auctions, and the Omnibus Law.establish_context
24
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for mobile penetration and a stacked bar chart for fixed broadband growth.analyze_data
25
Includes a specific callout regarding the 2018 SIM registration policy impact.analyze_data
26
The chart labels for 4G Availability incorrectly state '(Mbps)' instead of '(%)'.compare_peers
27
The slide uses a grouped bar chart with overlaid circles for EBITDA margin percentages.compare_peers
28
The chart uses a grouped bar-line combination to show absolute Capex (bars) and intensity (lines) for three distinct companies.compare_peers
29
The slide acts as a summary page for deeper dives provided on subsequent pages.present_solution
30
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke diagram to illustrate the stakeholder ecosystem around IdREN.illustrate_case
31
The slide uses a three-column structure to explain the funding source, infrastructure deployment, and social/educational impact.illustrate_case
32
The slide outlines the mandate of BAKTI (Telecommunication and Information Accessibility Agency) in Indonesia.establish_context
33
front_matter
34
frame_problem
35
front_matter
36
cite_precedent
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
37
The slide uses a split-screen comparison format to contrast two geographic regions.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
38
establish_context
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
39
Includes two bar charts and two geographic maps of Indonesia.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Golden Circle
40
The slide uses a comparison table format to evaluate funding mechanisms.recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Before After
41
The slide uses a combination of a waterfall-style growth chart and a peer comparison bar chart to argue that while total budget is high, marginal increases are diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Before After
42
The slide discusses policy mechanisms for spectrum auctions and provides a specific company example (Net1) to illustrate the feasibility of low-frequency connecpresent_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Before After
43
The slide outlines a 'payment-in-kind' model for infrastructure development in Indonesia.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Before After
44
Includes a quote from an ITU Sr. Advisor and a conceptual diagram of infrastructure ownership.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Before After
45
The slide uses a table-like structure to define the ecosystem of a 'Coverage as a Service' model involving large players, local players, and schools.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Before After
46
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
47
Uses a causal chain structure to link population and economic data to connectivity outcomes.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
48
Includes a vertical annotation 'Overlaps with region 1' next to the first row.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
49
The slide contrasts traditional spending with two advanced financial mechanisms (capital raising and guarantor role) and highlights the prerequisite of regulatopresent_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
50
Includes visual examples of school event sponsorships in Indonesia.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
51
Includes a financial performance table for the Zenzeleni Cooperative from 2017-2020.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
52
The slide uses a hierarchical structure to explain the support system for community-based micro-enterprises.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
53
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke structure to show the relationship between a central meso-level entity and multiple village-level entities.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
54
Includes a quote from a BCG expert regarding the economic challenges of rural connectivity.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
55
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
56
Uses a waterfall-style logic to show how different revenue/subsidy models reduce the total cost gap.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
57
Waterfall charts used to illustrate funding gaps for three distinct financial models.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
58
The slide outlines three distinct funding models: Coverage as a service, Government increases school funding, and One-off government subsidy.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
59
The chart uses a waterfall structure to bridge costs to a surplus. Includes specific assumptions for GNIpc spend, CAPEX/OPEX discounts, and education budget incquantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
60
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how various revenue and cost components lead to a theoretical surplus.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
61
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show how different revenue/subsidy models reduce the total cost gap for school connectivity.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
62
Uses a waterfall-style visualization to compare cost structures against different funding mechanisms.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
63
The slide outlines specific variables (CPM, GDP %, population counts, growth rates) required for the viability of four distinct business models.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
64
The slide uses a waterfall chart to illustrate the financial viability of different funding models for school connectivity in specific Indonesian regions.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
65
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how different funding sources contribute to covering costs and generating a surplus.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
66
front_matter
67
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
68
other
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
69
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps