Future of Work Tripartite Forum: Evidence base on the Future of Work

The Treasury
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

14
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The chart displays three scenarios (Early, Mid-point, Late) comparing actual adoption percentages against total potential percentages.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
05
The chart uses a split-axis design to separate job losses (left) from gains (middle) and net results (right).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
06
The slide uses a color-coded scale from red (low) to green (high) to represent employment growth projections.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
07
The slide uses a mid-point scenario for FTE projections.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
08
The chart segments regions into 'Highest automation adoption' and 'Lowest automation adoption' groups based on industry composition.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
09
The chart uses a baseline historical trend and projects future unemployment based on varying speeds of technology adoption.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
10
The chart compares 'Midpoint automation scenario' and 'Additional from earliest adoption scenario' across Japan, Australia, US, Germany, and New Zealand.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide uses a combination of bar charts and callout circles to illustrate the divergence between high-skill and low-skill labor impacts.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The chart illustrates a clear inverse relationship between the number of workers retrained and the projected increase in income inequality (Gini coefficient).quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The diagram uses a central hub-and-spoke layout with seven surrounding initiatives.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Jobs To Be Done
14
The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke style circular flow to show interdependence.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach