Strategy& · consulting-deck
eReadiness 2023 Survey
83 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops
eReadiness 2023 Survey
Strategy& arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
1510152025303540455055606570758083
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 60 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 18 hits — 0/4 slides
— 0/4 slides
50% 2/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Problem & Complication 8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 44 hits — 0/8 slides
50% 4/8 slides 37.5% 3/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 62.5% 5/8 slides Evidence & Proof 28 slides 100% 28/28 slides 100% 28/28 slides · 182 hits — 0/28 slides
57.1% 16/28 slides 21.4% 6/28 slides 100% 28/28 slides — 0/28 slides
Impact & Next Steps 20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides · 91 hits — 0/20 slides
— 0/20 slides
80% 16/20 slides 100% 20/20 slides 10% 2/20 slides Slide inventory
83 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
03
The slide uses a timeline-over-map visualization to show the expansion of the study from 4 countries in 2020 to 18 in 2023.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The map uses color-coding to distinguish between the three regions (NA, EMEA, APAC).establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
Uses a 3-column matrix structure to define research scope per segment.decompose_segments
09
Uses battery-shaped progress bars to visualize percentage data.decompose_segments
10
The slide uses a cluster profile framework to segment consumers based on their EV adoption status.compare_peers
11
The slide uses a Sankey-like visual connection between two stacked bar charts to show the transition from commuting habits to parking behavior.analyze_data
12
The slide uses two stacked bar charts to visualize survey data from 12,816 and 5,772 respondents respectively.analyze_data
14
The slide uses a table format to compare five key metrics across four geographic regions.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
15
The slide uses a color-coded bar chart approach within a table structure to visualize survey data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
16
The slide uses grouped bar charts to compare consumer behavior across three regions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
17
The slide uses a funnel-like visualization for the online journey steps and a vertical gauge/dot plot for NPS comparison.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
18
The slide uses a central donut chart to show overall purchase intention, flanked by two grouped bar charts detailing reasons for and barriers against online puranalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
19
The slide uses a three-part structure representing the customer journey: Consideration, Purchase, and Loyalty.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
20
Data based on 778 respondents per survey question.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
21
The slide uses two bar charts to contrast positive drivers and negative issues. It also includes a regional breakdown (APAC, EMEA, NA) for the top 2 reasons.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
22
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts and a segmented bar chart to illustrate consumer behavior.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
23
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the composition of the 60% of owners who purchased charging solutions.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
24
The slide uses a bar chart to rank purchasing criteria and a stacked bar chart with a callout to show incentive usage.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
25
The chart combines bar charts for installation frequency and a line chart for NPS scores across four installation categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
26
Data based on 84 detractors from a consumer survey.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
27
The chart displays 7 categories of products/services across 3 regions, totaling 21 data points.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
28
The chart uses battery-shaped icons to represent charging distributions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
29
The slide uses a grouped bar chart for frequency and a stacked bar chart for energy source.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
30
Includes data on charging power, tariff types, loyalty, and reasons for provider selection.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
31
The 2x2 matrix highlights 'High-priority issues' in the bottom-right quadrant (High Importance, Low Satisfaction).diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
32
The slide contains three distinct charts: two stacked bar charts for battery duration/age and state of health, and one stacked bar chart for cold weather range analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
33
The chart highlights 'Maintenance plan' as the focus of the next slide.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
34
The slide presents two bar charts side-by-side based on consumer survey data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
35
The chart uses a combination of bar charts and dot plots to show regional variance against an average.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
36
The slide uses a grouped bar chart structure to compare three segments across three metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
37
The slide uses a combination of a single bar chart for global/regional intent and two grouped bar charts for drivers and barriers.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
38
Data based on 778 respondents; multiple choice survey.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
39
The chart uses a grouped bar chart format to compare APAC, EMEA, and North America across 7 purchasing channels.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
40
The slide uses a table to contrast used EV owner profiles against new EV owners, highlighting regional variations in income, age, residential area, family size,analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
42
The slide uses a table format to compare five key metrics across four regions.analyze_data
43
The slide uses a table format to compare five key metrics across four geographic regions.analyze_data
44
Uses a grid-based framework to map personas to behavioral traits.present_framework
45
Uses a combination of bar charts for purchase intention and gauge charts for BEV/PHEV preference split.present_framework
46
The slide uses a combination of KPI metrics and comparative line charts to define a specific customer persona.present_framework
47
The slide uses a persona-based approach to segment EV prospects, contrasting 'Dreamers' with 'EV owners' across four demographic/behavioral dimensions.analyze_data
48
Uses a combination of icon-based attribute scoring and line charts for demographic profiling.present_framework
49
Uses a combination of icons, gauges, and line charts to contrast two segments.present_framework
50
The chart highlights 'Top 3 drivers' (Cost, Convenience, Environment) with a shaded background area.analyze_data
51
The slide uses two grouped bar charts to visualize survey data from 7,930 respondents.analyze_data
52
The chart includes a specific callout for cumulative percentage in the 0-40k range.analyze_data
53
The chart uses a combination of aggregate bars and regional dot markers to show variance across geographies.analyze_data
55
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to visualize consumer expectations for two key EV performance metrics.analyze_data
56
The chart uses a combination of bar charts and dot plots to show regional variance against the global average.analyze_data
57
The slide uses a background image of gas pump nozzles to visually reinforce the 'sceptic' theme.transition
58
The slide uses a structured table to compare five key metrics across four regions.analyze_data
59
The slide uses a color-coded table to highlight regional variations in consumer behavior.analyze_data
60
The chart displays 16 categories of rejection reasons, each with three bars representing the three regions.diagnose
62
The slide uses a 4-column layout to categorize the 14 KPIs.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
63
The chart uses country flags as visual identifiers along the x-axis.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
64
The slide uses a heatmap-style table with directional arrows to indicate performance changes compared to 2022.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
65
The slide uses a heatmap-style table to compare country performance across four key drivers of eReadiness.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
66
The slide uses a structured table format to define the methodology for scoring government incentives.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
67
The slide uses a battery-icon metaphor to represent incentive levels (1-5 scale).compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
68
The slide uses a battery-icon visual metaphor to represent scores from 1 to 5.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
69
The slide defines a scoring framework for infrastructure readiness, likely part of a larger index.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
70
The slide uses a battery-level visual metaphor to represent scores from 1 to 5.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
71
The slide uses battery icons as a visual metaphor for the KPI scores.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
72
The slide defines a scoring framework for three specific KPIs: BEV penetration, Top models annual depreciation, and Pure EV players.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
73
The slide uses a custom battery-icon visualization to represent qualitative scores (1-5) alongside quantitative data.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
74
The slide uses a battery-themed visual metaphor to represent scores (1-5).compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
75
The slide defines the methodology for calculating the 'Demand' dimension score using three specific KPIs.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
76
The slide uses a battery icon metaphor to represent scores from 1 (low) to 5 (high).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
77
The slide uses a battery icon metaphor to represent normalized scores (1-5).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
79
The slide presents a subset of recommendations (1/2) and uses a matrix-like structure to map actions to stakeholders.recommend
80
This is the second of two slides detailing recommendations.recommend
81
The slide uses a dark background with a large, stylized ampersand watermark.other