Corporate Headquarters Study

Roland Berger
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

35
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
front_matter
03
front_matter
04
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
The slide uses a two-part structure to summarize findings on megatrends and digital technologies in the context of corporate headquarters.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
Management summary (2/2)summarize
07
The diagram uses a concentric circle model to categorize CHQ capabilities into three tiers: Purpose and identity, Basic capabilities, and Value-adding capabilitdiagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
Includes footnote detailing the distribution of CHQ management concepts.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
transition
10
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
11
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
12
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke layout to connect six distinct megatrends to a central theme of digital/technological transformation.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
13
The framework uses concentric circles to represent the hierarchy of capabilities.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
14
CHQ stands for Corporate Headquarters.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
15
The chart uses a broken axis (indicated by //) to represent index values between 2.2 and 2.5.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
16
transition
17
The diagram uses a hub-and-spoke model to show how specific technologies feed into the three core levers of digital transformation.present_framework
18
The chart uses a broken axis (indicated by the double slash) to visualize the gap between impact and application scores.diagnose
19
The chart shows a positive correlation between peer performance ranking and digital technology application index scores.compare_peers
20
transition
21
The slide uses a matrix to map corporate functions against CHQ capabilities.diagnose
22
The slide uses a horizontal bar chart to rank functions by their involvement in capability execution.analyze_data
23
The chart uses a spider/radar plot to visualize performance across 10 distinct CHQ capability areas.compare_peers
24
transition
25
The slide uses donut charts to visualize survey responses regarding trends in CHQ function distribution.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
26
The slide uses donut charts to represent survey responses regarding trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
27
The slide uses pie charts to compare the percentage of 'Yes, increasing trend' responses across four performance cohorts for three different organizational trenquantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
28
The slide uses pie charts to visualize the percentage of respondents in each performance group who agree with specific organizational trends.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Why Now
29
CHQ stands for Corporate Headquarters.diagnose
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
The slide uses donut charts to visualize survey responses regarding future headcount changes.compare_options
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
32
The slide uses a dual-directional arrow to represent the integration of top-down and bottom-up approaches.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
33
The central diagram is a hub-and-spoke model with a circular process flow.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
34
This is a marketing/credibility slide showcasing thought leadership.other
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
35
front_matter