10th Operations Efficiency Radar

Roland Berger
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 5
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

74
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
The radar graphic is shaped like the letter B, likely for Berger.front_matter
02
Includes signatures of Oliver Knapp, Heimo Losbichler, and Carmen Zillmer.summarize
03
The slide uses a logical flow from background to analysis to recommendation.summarize
04
front_matter
05
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize risks and poses rhetorical questions on the right side to frame the business problem.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction
07
Uses a thermometer metaphor to represent the 'fragile environment' as a state of heat/pressure.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The slide acts as a cover or introduction to a specific study/report.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide uses a 'stack of documents' visual metaphor to represent multiple industry reports.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses a radar icon to represent the 'Operations Efficiency Radar' study.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The slide uses a radar graphic as a visual metaphor for 'Operations Efficiency Radar'.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to visualize the 'certain' vs 'very certain' activities, though the labels only show the total percentage.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The slide uses a chevron-based layout to represent business functions and their associated improvement levers.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The slide uses a custom visual layout to categorize levers. It includes a legend for symbols (arrows) and 'NEW' tags.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
Uses a timeline-like structure to show the impact of automation on operational, tactical, and strategic tasks.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
Uses a visual metaphor of a timeline/funnel to show evolution from 'Today' to 'Tomorrow'.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
The slide uses a binary choice framework to contrast operational efficiency vs. value creation.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide uses a stacked bar chart approach to show agreement levels (Agree vs Agree strongly) across various statements categorized as Risks or Opportunities.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The chart uses a dot plot to show the gap between risk (diamond) and opportunity (circle) for 10 corporate functions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
Includes a headshot and professional bio of the expert.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The slide uses a value chain diagram and a ranked list of 10 levers to communicate industry priorities.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts for survey agreement levels and a dot-plot/dumbbell chart to compare risk vs opportunity across functions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
Includes a headshot and professional bio of Manfred Hader, Senior Partner at Roland Berger.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
The slide uses a value chain diagram with numbered rankings for specific segments.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts for survey agreement levels and a dot plot with connecting lines to compare risk vs opportunity across functianalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
Includes a headshot and professional bio of Sven Siepen, Senior Partner at Roland Berger.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
The slide uses a value chain diagram to rank segments and a numbered list to detail strategic levers with trend indicators.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
33
The slide uses a dual-axis approach: bar charts for agreement levels on risks/opportunities and a dot plot with arrows to show the gap between risk and opportunanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
34
Includes a headshot and bio of Martin Erharter, Senior Partner at Roland Berger.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
35
The slide uses a value chain framework to rank priorities and lists 10 specific levers with trend indicators (up/down) compared to 2018.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
36
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts for survey agreement levels and a dot plot/connected scatter plot to compare risk vs. opportunity levels by fanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
37
Includes a headshot and professional bio of the expert.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
38
The slide uses a value chain diagram to rank priorities and a numbered list to detail the top 10 levers, including trend indicators.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
39
The chart on the right uses a DNA-like structure to compare risk vs opportunity across functions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
40
Includes a headshot and bio of Carsten Rossbach, Senior Partner at Roland Berger.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
41
Uses a value chain diagram to rank segments and a list to detail the top 10 levers.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
42
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts for survey agreement levels and a dot plot/scatter-style chart to compare risk vs opportunity perception acroanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
43
Includes a headshot and bio of Markus Strietzel, Senior Partner at Roland Berger.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
44
Uses a value chain diagram to map priorities and a numbered list for the top 10 levers.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
45
The slide uses a combination of stacked bar charts for survey agreement levels and a dot-plot/scatter-style chart to compare risk vs. opportunity across functioanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
46
The slide uses a ranked list format with horizontal bar charts to show the percentage of respondents who are 'certain' or 'very certain' about these priorities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
47
The slide uses a ranked list format for four industry verticals: Chemicals/Pharma, Consumer Goods and Retail, Industrial Services and IT, and Financial Servicessummarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
48
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
49
recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
50
The slide uses a visual representation of a study report to show how different leadership roles can apply the findings.recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
51
The slide uses a classic 'crisis curve' visualization to align organizational health with intervention intensity.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
52
The slide uses a spectrum-based layout to show increasing intensity of crisis preparation.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
53
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
54
Includes two pie charts for respondent demographics and a horizontal bar chart for company size trends.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
55
Includes a visual representation of a value chain and a screenshot of a survey/data collection instrument.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
56
other
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
57
The slide acts as a portfolio or credibility showcase of thought leadership.other
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
58
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
59
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table structure to show 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' responses.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
60
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table to show 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' activity levels.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
61
The slide uses a stacked bar representation within a table to show 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' planning activities.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
62
The table uses a stacked bar representation for 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' activities.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
63
The table displays a ranking of procurement levers with stacked bar charts representing 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' activity levels.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
64
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table structure to show the breakdown of 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' activities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
65
The slide uses a custom 'Operations Efficiency Radar' framework.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
66
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table structure to visualize survey data.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
67
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' activity levels for each lever.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
68
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table to show 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' activity planning.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
69
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table structure to visualize the 'Certain' vs 'Very certain' split.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
70
appendix
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
71
The slide uses a timeline framework to establish credibility through a long-standing track record and a high-profile client list.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
72
The slide uses an icon-grid layout to present key facts about a long-running survey.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
73
The slide acts as a summary of past special reports/deep dives.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
74
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps