Responding to Covid-19 (2021)

Oliver Wyman
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

25
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
02
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
03
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Setup
04
The slide uses a color-coded legend at the bottom to identify regions across two line charts.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Complication
05
The chart uses a log scale for the Y-axis. The slide includes a specific callout box for the COVID-19 transmission range.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Complication
06
The slide uses a comparison table format to contrast established epidemiological data with remaining scientific uncertainties.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Complication
07
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how different immunity sources aggregate to reach a threshold.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
Uses a contrast-based framing (geographic vs. biological impact) to reorient the audience's perspective.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to illustrate the overlap of specific mutations across different viral variants, supporting a strategic shift from variant-bpresent_framework
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide showcases three distinct analytical tools/outputs: a database interface, a risk reporting table, and a country-specific case study report.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The slide presents a structured approach to health risk assessment using four distinct categories.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The map uses a color-coded scale (green to dark red) to represent risk levels, with specific notes on data limitations and methodology.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to decompose immunity sources: vaccination, detected cases, and undetected cases.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · EvidenceLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The chart includes a forecast period starting May 4th, 2021, represented by dashed lines.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Why Now
15
The slide uses two choropleth maps to contrast vaccination coverage with supply utilization efficiency.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Why Now
16
The slide uses a small-multiple line chart approach to compare state-level performance against the US average.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Why Now
17
The chart uses a shaded area to represent the range of outcomes between optimistic and conservative projections.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Why Now
18
The chart highlights a herd immunity threshold range of 67%-75%.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · DevelopmentLoop · Why Now
19
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
20
The slide uses a combination of bulleted claims and a pull-quote to establish credibility.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
21
The table compares Ellume, Abbott, Lucira Health, and Cue.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
22
The table uses a matrix-like structure to map specific company approaches against policy categories.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
23
other
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
24
other
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution
25
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Resolution