McKinsey · consulting-deck
Technology Trends Outlook 2022
184 pages · 3 arc beats · 1 loops
Technology Trends Outlook 2022
McKinsey arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 1 LOOPS
1102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180184
Deck intelligence map
3 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 20 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 23 hits 25% 1/4 slides 75% 3/4 slides · 4 hits — 0/4 slides
100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Problem & Complication 6 slides 100% 6/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides · 30 hits — 0/6 slides
83.3% 5/6 slides 50% 3/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides 16.7% 1/6 slides Evidence & Proof 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 64 hits 20% 2/10 slides 60% 6/10 slides 10% 1/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides Slide inventory
184 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
02
The slide serves as a preface to a larger report on technology trends.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to represent qualitative relevance scores.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
06
Methodology description for a technology trend study.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
The image is a clear reference to Michelangelo's 'The Creation of Adam'.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
The slide features a stylized network visualization representing connectivity.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
10
The slide uses a horizontal spectrum/timeline-like layout to categorize connectivity technologies.present_framework
11
The slide uses a timeline-like structure to present key metrics across different categories of impact.summarize
13
The slide uses a list-based structure to map industries to specific connectivity-enabled use cases.quantify_impact
14
The slide uses a two-column layout to map industries to their specific technological disruptions.summarize
15
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive drivers (Benefits) against structural challenges (Risks and uncertainties).diagnose
17
The slide uses a list-based structure to present four distinct corporate examples across two industry sectors.cite_precedent
18
The slide uses a numbered list format to structure complex industry questions.frame_problem
22
The slide uses a split-layout: a bar chart on the left showing adoption rates by region, and a list of key metrics on the right.quantify_impact
23
The slide uses a bubble chart to show value at stake and a grouped bar chart to compare financial performance between 'Others' and 'Analytics leaders'.quantify_impact
24
The slide uses a stacked bar chart representation within a table format to visualize survey data.quantify_impact
25
The slide uses a nested circle diagram to represent the relationship between AI and its subfields.present_framework
26
The data highlights that product/service development, service operations, and marketing/sales are the primary functions for AI adoption.analyze_data
28
The slide provides a non-exhaustive list of industries with mature AI adoption.summarize
29
The table uses icons to represent use cases and color-coded bars (white/blue) to indicate innovation-led vs. business-adoption-led status.present_solution
30
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive outcomes (benefits) with negative challenges (risks).compare_options
31
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize AI-related debates, citing external authorities like the EU Commission and Stanford HAI.summarize
34
The slide uses a horizontal categorization framework to map compute locations to specific use cases.present_framework
35
The slide uses a timeline-like structure to present four distinct pillars of cloud adoption and impact.quantify_impact
36
The slide uses a timeline-like structure to present four distinct drivers for edge computing.summarize
37
The slide uses a before-and-after architectural diagram to explain the shift in network topology.present_framework
38
The slide uses a 2-column framework to categorize edge computing impacts.present_framework
39
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive and negative considerations.diagnose
40
The slide lists seven industries and their specific implications regarding edge computing adoption.summarize
41
The slide uses a list-based table format to map industries to their specific technological implications.summarize
43
The slide uses a numbered list format to present five distinct questions, each accompanied by a brief analysis of the trade-offs.frame_problem
46
The slide uses a structured table format to compare technology, description, and experience across four categories.present_framework
47
The slide uses a grid layout to categorize immersive-reality applications with illustrative icons for each.summarize
48
The slide uses a horizontal timeline-like structure to categorize trends and benefits.summarize
49
The slide contrasts AR and VR and highlights the 8-10 year horizon for significant advancements.summarize
51
The slide uses a matrix structure to compare AR and VR development stages over time.present_framework
52
The slide uses a bubble chart overlay on an illustrative city scene to represent worker counts by industry.size_opportunity
53
The slide uses a structured grid to map industries to specific use cases and quantitative impact metrics.summarize
54
The slide uses a column-based layout to map industries to specific use cases for immersive reality.summarize
56
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive and negative aspects of a technology trend.diagnose
57
The slide uses a numbered list format to present distinct thematic challenges.frame_problem
60
The slide uses a process flow diagram to illustrate the ML lifecycle from data management to live-model operations.present_framework
61
The slide uses a classic 'opportunity vs. challenge' split-screen layout.frame_problem
62
The slide uses a table-like structure to map specific value levers to quantitative impact metrics.quantify_impact
63
Uses a chevron-based process flow to categorize the comparison points.compare_options
64
The slide uses a process flow diagram to categorize ML technologies.present_framework
65
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast two distinct hardware approaches.present_framework
66
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive outcomes (benefits) against negative considerations (risks).compare_options
67
The slide uses a comparative table structure to highlight success stories across different industries.illustrate_case
72
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to show which technologies affect which stages of the SDLC.present_framework
73
The slide uses a two-column layout to categorize trends into market growth and capability augmentation, with a supporting narrative on the right.quantify_impact
74
Uses a split-screen layout to contrast 'before' (left) and 'after' (right) states.compare_options
75
The slide uses a process-oriented layout to map technologies to the SDLC.present_framework
76
The slide uses a table-like structure to map industries to examples and common qualities.analyze_data
77
The slide uses a table format to map SDLC stages to specific technologies and corporate case studies.illustrate_case
78
The slide uses a structured grid to map specific risks/uncertainties to six distinct technology domains.diagnose
79
The slide uses a numbered list format to present four distinct questions and their associated context.frame_problem
82
The slide uses a split-layout to distinguish between legacy quantum applications and future-looking quantum infrastructure.establish_context
83
The slide uses a three-pillar structure to summarize the business case for quantum technology.size_opportunity
84
The slide uses a clear side-by-side comparison structure to highlight the fundamental differences and trade-offs between classical and quantum computing.compare_options
86
The slide uses a structured list format to categorize quantum computing applications into four distinct archetypes.present_framework
90
The slide contrasts immediate hybrid computing benefits with long-term R&D goals for quantum processors.summarize
92
The slide uses a structured list format to present complex industry uncertainties.frame_problem
95
The slide defines four key pillars of digital trust technologies in the context of cybersecurity.summarize
96
The slide uses a split-layout to contrast the 'problem' (left) with the 'solution/opportunity' (right).frame_problem
97
The slide uses a three-column structure to contrast opportunities, complications, and resulting value.summarize
98
The slide uses a before-after framing to explain the transition to zero-trust architecture.compare_options
99
The slide uses a table structure to contrast two digital identity technologies.compare_options
101
The slide uses a table-like structure to map industries to specific impacts of digital-trust technologies.summarize
102
The slide uses a list-based table format to map industries to specific technology impacts.summarize
103
The slide is divided into a white background section for specific technology trends and a dark blue sidebar for overarching risks.summarize
104
The slide uses a list-based structure to categorize examples by technology domain.illustrate_case
105
The slide uses a numbered list format to structure complex industry debates.frame_problem
108
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast the current state (Web2) with the emerging state (Web3).compare_options
109
The slide uses a horizontal list of five pillars to explain the strategic importance of Web3.summarize
110
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for talent and a bar chart for capital to show growth trends.quantify_impact
111
Uses a layered framework to distinguish between underlying tech (blockchain, smart contracts, assets) and top-level applications (DeFi, DAO, etc.).present_framework
113
The slide uses a split-layout design to contrast positive innovations against potential risks in the gaming sector.illustrate_case
114
The slide is split into two columns: left for innovations and right for risks, specifically focusing on the retail industry.diagnose
115
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive innovations against negative risks and uncertainties.diagnose
116
The slide uses a 3x2 grid layout to present distinct categories of uncertainty.frame_problem
117
The slide uses a Venn diagram to illustrate the intersection of three strategic pillars.recommend
119
The slide uses a numbered list format to frame strategic questions.frame_problem
124
The slide highlights a convergence of biological and information technologies.present_framework
125
The slide is divided into two main columns: increasing efforts in development/adoption and the potential for transformative new capabilities.quantify_impact
126
The slide uses a non-exhaustive list format to categorize bioengineering innovations.summarize
127
The slide uses a table-like structure to map industries to their specific impacts from the bioengineering trend.summarize
128
The slide uses a color-coded system (blue for benefits, red for risks) to categorize outcomes.quantify_impact
129
The slide uses a color-coded system (blue for benefits, red for risks) to categorize outcomes.quantify_impact
130
The slide uses a color-coded system (blue for benefits, red for risks) to evaluate the impact of cultivated meat.quantify_impact
131
The slide uses a color-coded system (blue for benefits, red for risks) to structure the impact analysis.quantify_impact
132
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive and negative considerations.compare_options
133
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize complex ethical and societal debates.frame_problem
136
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize energy solutions.establish_context
137
The slide uses a structured layout to categorize clean energy trends into two main pillars: Power storage and Power distribution.summarize
138
The slide uses a horizontal timeline-like structure to present four distinct market drivers.establish_context
139
The slide uses a horizontal timeline-like structure to present key metrics for different energy technologies.quantify_impact
140
The slide uses a structured grid layout to present technical summaries of specific energy sectors.present_framework
142
The slide uses a split-layout design with a white background for the left side (technologies) and a dark blue background for the right side (disruptions).summarize
143
The slide is split into two columns: the left focuses on technology and capabilities, while the right highlights key quantitative disruptions.quantify_impact
146
The slide uses a four-column layout with icons to categorize sector-specific challenges, followed by a summary callout box for overarching macro-uncertainties.diagnose
147
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to contrast perspectives on three specific questions.compare_options
150
The slide uses a split-layout with a narrative on the left and a structured framework of mobility drivers on the right.establish_context
151
The slide uses a 3-column layout to present key drivers of change in the mobility sector.summarize
152
The slide uses the ACES framework, a standard industry acronym for mobility trends.present_framework
153
The table uses color-coded bars (blue for hardware, light blue for software/AI) to classify technologies.summarize
154
The slide uses a nested matrix structure to map mobility innovations.present_framework
155
The slide uses a structured table format to map industries to specific strategic implications.summarize
156
The slide uses a list-based table format to map industries to specific technological implications.summarize
157
The slide uses a comparative structure to map technology applications across different sectors and functional areas.present_solution
158
The slide uses a table format to map industries to specific technologies, companies, and the resulting disruption/impact.illustrate_case
160
The slide uses a numbered list format to categorize complex industry debates.frame_problem
163
The slide uses two scatter plots to demonstrate cost reduction trends over time.summarize
164
The slide uses a horizontal layout with icons to structure five distinct market drivers.summarize
165
The slide highlights the transition from GEO to LEO architectures and the impact of consumer tech on satellite capabilities.summarize
166
The slide uses a four-column layout to categorize emerging space technologies.summarize
167
The slide lists eight distinct sectors (Forestry, Hydrology, Agriculture, Land cover, Geology, Mapping, Oceans, Sea/Ice) and their specific use cases.summarize
168
The slide uses a grid layout to categorize five distinct future space activities.present_solution
172
The slide uses a numbered list format to present distinct policy and ethical challenges in the space sector.frame_problem
175
The slide uses a grid-based layout to categorize sustainable consumption patterns and types.present_framework
176
The slide uses a split-level approach (Macro vs Micro) to justify sustainability investments.size_opportunity
177
The slide uses a 3x2 grid structure to categorize various sustainable technologies.present_framework
179
The slide uses a list-based table format to map industries to specific sustainability-driven technological implications.analyze_data
180
The slide uses a list format to map specific technology categories to real-world corporate initiatives.illustrate_case
181
The slide uses a split-screen layout to contrast positive outcomes (benefits) against potential challenges (risks).compare_options
182
The slide uses a numbered list format to structure complex industry debates.frame_problem