McKinsey · consulting-deck
Quantum Technology Monitor 2022
53 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops
Quantum Technology Monitor 2022
McKinsey arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
124681012141618202224262830323436384042444648505253
Deck intelligence map
4 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 39 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Attention 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 13 hits — 0/4 slides
— 0/4 slides
— 0/4 slides
100% 4/4 slides — 0/4 slides
Need 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 37 hits 80% 4/5 slides 80% 4/5 slides 20% 1/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides Satisfaction 16 slides 100% 16/16 slides 100% 16/16 slides · 97 hits 75% 12/16 slides 25% 4/16 slides 25% 4/16 slides 100% 16/16 slides — 0/16 slides
Action 14 slides 100% 14/14 slides 100% 14/14 slides · 76 hits 42.9% 6/14 slides 21.4% 3/14 slides 14.3% 2/14 slides 100% 14/14 slides 35.7% 5/14 slides Slide inventory
53 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Features a compass graphic, likely symbolizing navigation or market direction.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
02
The slide uses checkmarks and an X to distinguish between what the document provides and what it does not.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Attention
05
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke style diagram to represent the interconnected nature of the three quantum technology domains.present_framework
06
The slide is split into a sidebar listing new monitor additions and a main body detailing 2H2021 developments.summarize
08
The slide uses a three-column layout with icons to summarize key market insights.summarize
09
The slide uses a Venn-like diagram to represent the three sectors, though they are presented as distinct categories.size_opportunity
11
The chart uses a combination of solid and dashed lines to represent actual vs. estimated funding.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
12
The chart uses a line graph to visualize growth, with a dashed box highlighting the recent plateau/slowdown period.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
13
The slide uses a split-screen layout with a light background on the left and a dark background on the right, typical of McKinsey style.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
14
The table includes a legend for icons representing Quantum computing and Quantum communication, and footnotes explaining data limitations and specific deal contanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
15
The chart uses a broken axis for the United States bar to accommodate the large value. Includes a specific callout for the Honeywell/Cambridge Quantum merger.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
16
The slide uses a bar chart for global funding and a pie chart for EU-specific funding distribution.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
17
The slide highlights that Quantum Computing (QC) receives the majority of US public funding compared to Quantum Communications (QComms) and Quantum Sensing (QS)analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
20
The table includes a footnote regarding data transparency for China and Japan.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
21
The table is organized into three columns of country lists, each with 2021 and 2015 data points.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
22
The chart uses a waterfall-style layout to represent the distribution of companies across segments, with a total count at the end.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
23
The slide uses a cumulative area chart to visualize growth and a table to provide granular annual data.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
24
The slide uses a value-chain style process flow to categorize the QC market segments.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
25
The slide uses a value chain diagram to segment the market into Equipment/components, Hardware, Systems software, Application software, and Services.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Satisfaction
26
The slide uses a value-chain style process diagram to segment the market.analyze_data
27
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to compare funding distribution across six different quantum computing technologies.analyze_data
28
The slide uses a value-chain style chevron diagram to position 'Systems software' within the broader quantum computing stack.present_framework
29
The slide uses a value-chain style process diagram to categorize market segments into mature and developing markets.frame_problem
30
The slide uses a value chain diagram to contextualize the services segment within the broader quantum computing market.present_framework
32
The data is non-exhaustive and includes a disclaimer regarding transparency in China and Japan.analyze_data
33
The chart uses a waterfall-style layout to show the distribution of players across segments, with funding percentages below.analyze_data
34
The slide uses a value-chain style process flow to categorize market segments.present_framework
36
The data is presented in two columns for countries, with 2021 and 2015 counts for each.analyze_data
37
The chart uses a waterfall-like structure to show the distribution of players across three segments: Component manufacturers, Hardware manufacturers, and Applicsize_opportunity
40
The slide uses a color-coded dot system to represent the degree of economic value impact (incremental, significant, disruptive).quantify_impact
41
The slide uses a color-coded heatmap to represent value, with blue indicating higher value and red indicating lower value.size_opportunity
43
The slide uses a table with embedded bar charts to visualize patent share distribution.analyze_data
44
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to contrast total publication volume (implied by the bar lengths) with h-index impact (the numerical values).summarize
45
The slide highlights the dominance of China, the US, and the EU in quantum research output.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
46
The slide highlights both total volume and density per million inhabitants.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
47
The slide uses two side-by-side horizontal bar charts to contrast research capacity with degree program availability.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action
48
The chart uses a broken axis for the 350k bar to accommodate the scale difference.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Action
51
The slide details specific inclusion/exclusion criteria for quantum technology players and the data sources for investment and market sizing.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Action