U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform · consulting-deck
Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report
53 pages · 3 arc beats · 2 loops
Opioid Conflicts Majority Staff Report
U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
124681012141618202224262830323436384042444648505253
Deck intelligence map
3 coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 53 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Problem & Complication 5 slides 100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides · 29 hits — 0/5 slides
20% 1/5 slides — 0/5 slides
100% 5/5 slides 100% 5/5 slides Evidence & Proof 23 slides 100% 23/23 slides 100% 23/23 slides · 152 hits 13% 3/23 slides 13% 3/23 slides 4.3% 1/23 slides 100% 23/23 slides 100% 23/23 slides · 28 hits Impact & Next Steps 25 slides 100% 25/25 slides 100% 25/25 slides · 183 hits 4% 1/25 slides — 0/25 slides
— 0/25 slides
100% 25/25 slides 100% 25/25 slides · 37 hits Slide inventory
53 every slide · same image gating as the playbook
03
This is a text-heavy document page, likely from a congressional or oversight committee report.summarize
04
This slide appears to be part of a larger report or legal disclosure document, indicated by the page number '4' at the bottom.summarize
05
This appears to be a page from a congressional or investigative report.summarize
06
This appears to be a page from a formal report or congressional document.establish_context
07
This is a page from a formal report or legal document, likely a Congressional Committee report.summarize
08
This appears to be a page from a formal government or investigative report.summarize
09
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or congressional document.cite_precedent
10
This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, likely an appendix or disclosure section.other
11
This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (likely a Congressional or regulatory report) rather than a standard consulting deck, but it is iappendix
12
This page appears to be from a formal investigative report or legal document, given the heavy reliance on document reference numbers (MCK-HCOR) as footnotes.appendix
13
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.cite_precedent
14
This page appears to be from a legal or investigative report, containing detailed footnotes referencing internal McKinsey documents.other
15
This page appears to be an excerpt from a formal report or investigative document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.summarize
16
The slide highlights potential conflicts of interest by showing consultants who worked for both regulatory bodies and the companies they regulated.cite_precedent
17
Contains extensive footnotes documenting specific internal McKinsey engagement lists and correspondence.summarize
18
This page appears to be an excerpt from a report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.appendix
19
The slide highlights potential conflicts of interest by mapping concurrent consulting engagements and meetings.illustrate_case
20
This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (e.g., a congressional report) rather than a standard consulting deck.cite_precedent
21
This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing footnotes and narrative text.appendix
22
The slide serves as a disclosure/evidence page for a report, citing specific internal documents.cite_precedent
23
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.summarize
24
The slide is an embedded image within a larger document, likely a report or legal filing.illustrate_case
25
This page appears to be an excerpt from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and narrative text.other
26
This slide is a text-heavy disclosure page from a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.summarize
27
This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and extensive footnotes.appendix
28
This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence section.appendix
29
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or committee document, given the footnote citations.other
30
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, containing narrative text and footnotes.summarize
31
The slide includes an excerpt from an email sent by McKinsey partners to a client, highlighting their strategy to win business.illustrate_case
32
This page appears to be from a legal or investigative report, containing numbered footnotes referencing internal documents.summarize
33
The slide is embedded within a larger document; the red oval is an annotation from the document author, not the original slide.present_solution
34
This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, not a standard consulting deck slide.summarize
35
Page 35 of a larger document, containing extensive footnotes citing legal and journalistic sources.summarize
36
This is a text-heavy page from a report or legal document, likely an appendix or supporting evidence page.other
37
This is a page from a legal or investigative report, containing footnotes and legal citations.appendix
38
This is a page from a formal investigative report, likely a Congressional committee report.summarize
39
This is a page from a formal report or legal document, likely a congressional or investigative committee report.summarize
40
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document.summarize
41
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, containing footnotes and an email excerpt.cite_precedent
42
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, indicated by the footnote citations.other
43
This slide appears to be from a report or legal document detailing McKinsey's involvement with Purdue Pharma, specifically focusing on the 'ADF Strategy'.cite_precedent
44
The slide contains a pull-quote highlighting the core strategy and detailed footnotes citing internal McKinsey documents and external reports.summarize
45
This slide appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, containing narrative text and footnotes.summarize
46
This appears to be a page from a legal or investigative report (indicated by footnotes and redacted text).other
47
This appears to be a page from a formal investigative report or legal document, given the footnote style and content.cite_precedent
48
This page contains footnotes 229-236.appendix
49
This appears to be a page from a formal report or legal document, indicated by the footnote numbering and page number at the bottom.appendix
50
This appears to be a page from a congressional or investigative report (page 50).summarize
51
This page contains footnotes referencing specific internal documents (MCK-HCOR codes) and news articles.cite_precedent
52
Page 52 of a report, likely a congressional or investigative document.summarize
53
This appears to be a page from a formal government or committee report, likely an appendix or disclosure section.summarize