Quantum Technology Monitor 2021

McKinsey
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

45
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
Includes a compass graphic as a visual metaphor for monitoring/navigation.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · What Is
02
The slide uses a 'What it is' vs 'What it is not' framing to manage expectations regarding the comprehensiveness of the data.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · What Is
03
Uses a Venn-like diagram to show the interconnected nature of the three quantum domains.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · What IsLoop · Iceberg
04
McKinsey & Company slide 4.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · What IsLoop · Iceberg
05
Uses a Venn-like diagram to represent the interconnected nature of the three quantum technology sectors.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · What IsLoop · Iceberg
06
The slide uses a timeline framework to show the acceleration of quantum technology developments.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Market LandscapeLoop · Iceberg
07
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Market LandscapeLoop · Iceberg
08
The chart uses a dual-axis approach to correlate the number of start-ups (white line) with funding volume (blue line).size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Market LandscapeLoop · Iceberg
09
McKinsey & Company slide 9.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Market LandscapeLoop · Iceberg
10
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Market LandscapeLoop · Iceberg
11
The chart uses a dark theme with a clear legend for investor types. Data is in millions of dollars.analyze_data
12
The slide highlights the dominance of China and the EU in quantum technology funding as of June 2021.analyze_data
13
The table highlights the dominance of the US and Canada in the quantum computing ecosystem, with a note on limited transparency regarding Chinese activity.analyze_data
14
The map uses bubble sizes to represent the number of start-ups in specific regions/countries.size_opportunity
15
The chart uses a waterfall-style layout to show the breakdown of 213 total players across 5 segments.size_opportunity
16
The chart uses a stacked area representation to show the composition of start-ups by sector over time.analyze_data
17
The slide uses a value chain structure to map market maturity and competitive dynamics.present_framework
18
Part of a series of slides analyzing different segments of the quantum computing value chain.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Key Takeaways
19
Part of a series of slides analyzing different segments of the quantum computing value chain.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Key Takeaways
20
Part of a larger deck structure indicated by the top navigation bar.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Key Takeaways
21
The slide uses a navigation bar at the top to indicate the current focus area (Application software) within a broader quantum computing value chain.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Key Takeaways
22
Part of a larger industry taxonomy deck; this slide focuses on the 'Services' segment.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Key Takeaways
23
front_matter
24
The slide uses a growth curve overlaying a categorical maturity framework.present_framework
25
The slide uses a color-coded dot system to represent impact levels (incremental, significant, disruptive).size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
front_matter
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide uses bubble sizes to represent the number of start-ups per region.size_opportunity
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the composition of 111 total players across five segments.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
29
The slide uses a value-chain style process flow to categorize market segments.present_framework
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
front_matter
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
QS likely stands for Quantum Systems or Quantum Start-ups. The map uses bubble sizes to represent the number of start-ups per region.size_opportunity
32
The chart uses a non-standard waterfall layout to represent segments of the value chain.analyze_data
33
The slide uses a process-like flow to categorize market maturity across three segments: Equipment/components, Hardware, and Application software.present_framework
34
front_matter
35
The slide uses a dark sidebar for key takeaways, a common McKinsey style.summarize
36
The slide uses a dual-chart approach to contrast total publication volume (EU lead) with citation impact (US lead).summarize
37
The slide highlights the distinction between absolute volume (India leads) and density (UK leads).summarize
38
Slide 38 from a McKinsey & Company deck.summarize
39
The slide uses a dark background with blue accents for key metrics.quantify_impact
40
front_matter
41
The slide details criteria for categorizing start-ups vs incumbents and specific inclusions/exclusions for component manufacturers, hardware manufacturers, and present_framework
42
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to illustrate market potential across three scenarios, with qualitative assumptions listed below each scenario.quantify_impact
43
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to represent market potential in EUR billions across three scenarios from 2025 to 2040.quantify_impact
44
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to represent market potential by value stream across three scenarios (Low, Base, High) from 2025 to 2040.analyze_data
45
front_matter