anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
McKinsey · consulting-deck

Technology Mineral Criticality

28 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops

Consulting-Deck Download JSON
Unlock

Technology Mineral Criticality

McKinsey
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 1
— No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.
—

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 24 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 3 slides 100% 3/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides · 10 hits
— 0/3 slides
— 0/3 slides
33.3% 1/3 slides 100% 3/3 slides
— 0/3 slides
Problem & Complication 4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides · 23 hits 50% 2/4 slides 75% 3/4 slides 25% 1/4 slides 100% 4/4 slides 25% 1/4 slides Solution & Approach 8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 41 hits 50% 4/8 slides 37.5% 3/8 slides 37.5% 3/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 10 hits Evidence & Proof 9 slides 100% 9/9 slides 100% 9/9 slides · 44 hits 55.6% 5/9 slides 44.4% 4/9 slides
— 0/9 slides
100% 9/9 slides 55.6% 5/9 slides

Slide inventory

28
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
The diagram uses a nested box structure to show how Technology and Financing are positioned within the broader context of Demand, Supply, and Political/Responsipresent_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The slide uses two line charts to show production trends indexed to 1980, highlighting growth rates before and after the 1991 technology inflection point.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
05
The slide uses a map-based layout to present regional data tables, with a list of five key socio-economic drivers on the left.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
06
The chart uses a scatter plot approach on a 2x2 grid. The legend indicates 'Most important driver' categories.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
07
The data represents commodity lifetimes based on current economically viable reserves.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
The slide contrasts the geographic distribution of existing mines with the concentration of exploration capital.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The slide uses a combination of a line chart for revenue and a stacked bar chart for investment components (Capex, Asset M&A, Corporate M&A).diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide uses a structured table format to compare strategic options for capacity expansion.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The slide uses a line chart for historical mining productivity and a bar chart for cross-industry OEE comparison.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The matrix uses color-coded dots to indicate the scope of commodity applicability (single, group, or most).present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide uses a 'Situation vs Impact' framework to demonstrate the value of the 'McKinsey Rapid Yield Boost' approach.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The chart is a waterfall-style representation of cumulative impact.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done
17
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done
18
Includes specific assumptions about Grasberg and Escondida mines in the footer.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done
19
The slide uses dual line charts to illustrate demand growth, with callout bubbles indicating the scale of impact relative to current demand and mine output.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done
20
The slide uses a custom legend for likelihood (pie charts) and price impact (arrows).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Jobs To Be Done
21
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
22
The chart uses an indexed scale (2000=100) to compare growth rates across three different commodities.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
23
The slide uses a red dashed box to highlight the period of significant cost adjustment around 2015.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
24
The slide uses a table-like structure to map specific technologies to quantitative outcomes and a descriptive case study for remote operations.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
25
The chart is a waterfall-style visualization showing a demand range and a supply figure with a gap.frame_problem
Open slide detail
26
The slide uses a comparative table structure with embedded bar charts to visualize the impact of different scrap intensity scenarios.compare_options
Open slide detail
27
appendix
Open slide detail
28
The diagram uses a nested box structure to show the interplay between demand and supply sides.diagnose
Open slide detail