anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
McKinsey · consulting-deck

Future Energy Landscape Netherlands

38 pages · 4 arc beats · 2 loops

Consulting-Deck Download JSON
Unlock

Future Energy Landscape Netherlands

McKinsey
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
— No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.
—

Deck intelligence map

4
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 38 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 58 hits 70% 7/10 slides 90% 9/10 slides 20% 2/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides
— 0/10 slides
Problem & Complication 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 63 hits 70% 7/10 slides 30% 3/10 slides 10% 1/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides
— 0/10 slides
Solution & Approach 10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides · 55 hits 80% 8/10 slides 60% 6/10 slides 30% 3/10 slides 100% 10/10 slides 20% 2/10 slides Impact & Next Steps 8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 49 hits 75% 6/8 slides 37.5% 3/8 slides 62.5% 5/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 50% 4/8 slides

Slide inventory

38
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
The slide uses a metaphorical image of an elephant racing against greyhounds to represent the energy landscape.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
The chart highlights a ~50% reduction in LCOE for solar PV auctions over an 18-month period.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
The chart illustrates a 45% reduction in LCOE for onshore wind projects across various global markets.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The chart illustrates a cost reduction trend in the offshore wind industry, highlighting a >60% drop from ~135 to 50 EUR/MWh.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
The slide combines a line/area chart for historical trends and a bar chart inset for specific 2020/2025 industry estimates.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
06
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
07
The chart uses a stacked area format to show the relative contribution of different commodities (Crude oil, Natural gas, Thermal coal, Iron ore, Copper) to totaanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
08
The slide uses a 'zoom' effect to connect a cross-industry profit distribution (left) to a time-series performance of a single sector (right).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
09
The chart uses a series of bar charts to represent a cash flow calculation: Operating Cash Flow - Capex - Dividends = Discretionary Spending.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
10
Uses a decomposition tree structure to show how ROIC is derived from operational metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
11
McKinsey & Company branding present.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
12
The chart uses a 2014 index of 100. The McKinsey BaU (Q4 '16) line is highlighted in bold blue.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
13
The slide uses three distinct chart types to show trends in GDP growth, economic structure, and vehicle efficiency.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
14
The slide uses a BAU scenario to project energy demand. The chart shows absolute values in million terajoules and percentage shares for 2014 vs 2050.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
15
The chart highlights a peak in coal usage around 2025 and provides CAGR figures for each energy source.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
16
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to represent growth/decline intensity (green for growth, red for decline).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
17
The chart shows a steady increase in total liquids demand over the period, reaching 110.5 million barrels per day by 2050.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
18
McKinsey & Company branding present.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
19
The slide uses a 'thought experiment' framing to contrast BAU and Tech Disruption metrics.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
20
Includes McKinsey Energy Insights and IEA data. Shows BAU vs TECH scenarios across three metrics.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
21
The chart shows two distinct periods (2015-2025 and 2025-2035) using a waterfall structure to show growth (BaU) and reduction (Disruption).quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
22
The slide uses a comparative scenario analysis approach to illustrate the impact of technology acceleration on energy demand and emissions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
23
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
24
The chart uses a stacked bar comparison to illustrate a 53% total revenue decline, with specific percentage drops for each component.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
25
The slide uses a combination of a bar-line chart for market balance and a list of assumptions to justify the scenario.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
26
The slide uses a combination of bar charts to show the drivers of production growth (rig count and efficiency).quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
27
The chart uses a stacked area format to show the contribution of different basins (Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken, Other) to total US LTO production.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
28
McKinsey & Company branding present.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
29
The chart compares a historical reduction rate of 0.7%/yr with a required future rate of 2%/yr (3x acceleration).quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
30
The chart uses a stacked bar approach to show current emissions vs historical reductions, with a focus on CO2 as the current priority.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
31
The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) plot to visualize both the total emissions per sector and the composition of energy sources within those sectors.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
32
The slide uses a three-column structure: current vs 2040 energy demand, key assumptions, and investment magnitude.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Cost Of Inaction
33
The slide uses a layered map visualization to represent different energy sources and their spatial requirements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
34
The diagram visualizes energy consumption in Petajoules (PJ) across different sectors.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
35
The slide uses a Sankey diagram to visualize energy flows.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
36
The chart uses a waterfall structure to aggregate investment needs across demand-side and system-side categories.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
37
present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet
38
The chart uses a stylized silhouette of a worker and wind turbines to illustrate the shift in labor demand from 2020 to beyond 2050.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Quick Win Big Bet