Education: 2022 M&A Deal Roundup and Trends to Watch Out for in 2023

L.E.K.
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 7 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

45
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
02
front_matter
03
summarize
04
summarize
05
The chart uses a dual-axis approach: a bar chart for transaction counts (split by disclosed/undisclosed) and a line chart for global M&A transaction volume, witanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
06
Includes CAGR data and qualitative drivers for 2018, 2019, and 2022.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
07
The chart uses a dual-axis style visualization for time-series data with qualitative annotations.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
08
The chart highlights the dominance of private equity in education sector M&A activity.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
09
L.E.K. consulting slide deck page 9.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
10
The slide uses a timeline-based segmentation of market phases (Growth, Peak, Stabilization).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
11
The chart uses a 100% stacked bar approach for each category, with total transaction values labeled above each bar.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
12
Includes a dual-axis chart (bar for value, line for count) and a supporting data table.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
13
The chart is a stacked bar chart showing regional composition of global education investment. Callouts highlight specific regional trends (US, China, India).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
14
The chart uses a stacked bar format to show segment composition over time, with callouts for specific major acquisitions.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
15
The chart is a stacked bar chart comparing two categories (Developed vs Developing) with sub-segments representing different education sectors.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
16
The slide uses stacked bar charts to show market composition and growth/decline rates between years.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Mece Breakdown
17
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
18
The slide uses a two-column layout to group trends under two main headers.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Three Horizons
19
The slide uses a map-based visualization to show the global footprint of various K-12 education groups.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Three Horizons
20
The slide uses a color-coded map and callout boxes to detail specific institutions, their scale, revenue, and last funding year.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Three Horizons
21
The chart shows a clear divergence in growth rates between online and contact education, with online consistently outperforming.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Three Horizons
22
The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to categorize market players in the online higher education space.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Three Horizons
23
Includes CAGR data by country and a trend line for total enrollment.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
24
The chart uses a diverging bar structure to show growth rates; the right side lists specific country-level policy goals.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
25
The chart uses a broken axis to accommodate the large discrepancy between the Europe/North America region and others.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
26
The slide uses two different chart types to illustrate learning loss: a bar chart showing negative delta for global countries and a grouped bar chart for US NAEanalyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
27
The slide uses a 'problem-solution' structure where the left side identifies the pain points (learning gaps) and the right side provides the market landscape ofpresent_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Cost Of Inaction
28
The slide uses a numbered list format to present four distinct trends in the adult learning sector.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Segmentation Split
29
The slide uses a two-row layout to contrast two distinct trends, each with a descriptive summary and company examples.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Segmentation Split
30
The slide uses a logo-grid layout to illustrate market participants across three segments.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Segmentation Split
31
Part of a series of 'Key trends for investors in 2023'.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Segmentation Split
32
The slide uses a three-column layout to categorize edtech trends by technology type.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Segmentation Split
33
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
34
The chart uses a categorical grid layout to map companies to specific edtech subsegments.decompose_segments
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
35
The chart uses a custom matrix layout to segment companies based on funding and scale. It is not a standard 2x2 but a multi-segment grid.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
36
The slide uses a grid layout to categorize companies by geography and sector.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
37
The matrix uses a 6x5 grid structure to map companies based on funding (y-axis) and scale (x-axis).prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
38
The slide uses a matrix structure to segment companies for potential investment opportunities.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
39
The slide uses a grid layout to map company logos to specific education subsegments.decompose_segments
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
40
The slide uses a matrix-like layout to organize companies by their primary service area.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
41
The chart uses a grid layout to categorize companies by subsegment (y-axis) and country (x-axis), with logos representing individual assets.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
42
The chart uses a custom grid layout rather than a standard 2x2, effectively acting as a bubble/scatter plot with categorical axes.prioritize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
43
The slide uses a matrix layout to categorize companies by geography (India, SEA, East Asia, Australia) and funding stage.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · 2x2 Matrix
44
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
45
This is a standard corporate boilerplate slide.other
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps