Insights from the leading edge of generative AI adoption

Deloitte
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 2 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

34
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
The slide serves as a preface/foreword to a larger report.front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
04
The slide uses a high-quality stock photo of a professional team to establish a business context. It frames the narrative around the historical adoption patternestablish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
05
Includes methodology details and definitions for Generative AI.summarize
06
The slide serves as a section divider or transition to the findings section of the deck.transition
07
The slide uses a bubble chart to visualize emotional sentiment distribution.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
The slide uses a dark background with a high-contrast green donut chart.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
09
The slide uses a donut chart to visualize survey responses regarding AI expertise levels.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
10
The slide uses a comparison table to contrast 'Very high expertise' vs 'Some expertise' across six sentiment metrics.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
11
The slide uses a bubble chart to visualize survey results regarding AI benefits.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
13
The chart displays adoption rates across 8 functions and 5 expertise levels (Total, Little, Some, High, Very high).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
14
The slide uses a rhetorical question as a title to frame the discussion around historical technology adoption patterns.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
15
The slide contrasts current tactical adoption with future potential for strategic, differentiated use cases.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
16
The slide uses a 'Now: Key findings' header and includes a reference to 'figure 7'.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
17
The chart uses a 5-point Likert scale for preparedness.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
18
The slide uses a custom bubble-path diagram to visualize survey data on risk management actions.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
19
Figure 9analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
20
Figure 10. Data source: Q: What level of effort is your organization taking regarding the following workforce-related areas? (Oct./Dec. 2023) N (Total) = 2,835analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Cost Of Inaction
21
The slide uses a pull-quote format over a background image of two colleagues collaborating.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
22
The slide uses a large callout metric to highlight a key finding regarding economic inequality.summarize
Open slide detailLoop · Cost Of Inaction
23
The slide uses stacked bar charts to visualize survey data regarding economic power and inequality shifts due to GenAI.analyze_data
24
The slide uses a dot-matrix visualization to represent survey percentages.summarize
25
The slide serves as a transition or conclusion to the current report, setting the stage for future research.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
26
The slide uses a 'Next: Looking ahead' header to signal a shift in the deck's narrative flow.transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
27
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
28
The slide uses a minimalist design with a strong, thesis-driven headline and abstract graphic elements.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
29
The slide uses a split-column layout to pose two distinct strategic inquiries.state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
30
state_next_steps
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
31
other
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
32
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
33
The slide provides transparency on the survey methodology, including the total N=2,835 and the breakdown of respondents by country.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
34
other
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps