anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
BCG · consulting-deck

US Mail Volumes to 2020

41 pages · 5 arc beats · 7 loops

Consulting-Deck Download JSON
Unlock

US Mail Volumes to 2020

BCG
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 7 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
— No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.
—

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON
Narrative range 24 total
Metadata
Components
Metrics
Tools
Frameworks
Beats
Loops
Situation & Context 6 slides 100% 6/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides · 27 hits 16.7% 1/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides · 17 hits 50% 3/6 slides 100% 6/6 slides 66.7% 4/6 slides Problem & Complication 8 slides 100% 8/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 37 hits 62.5% 5/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 28 hits 12.5% 1/8 slides 100% 8/8 slides · 16 hits 87.5% 7/8 slides Evidence & Proof 7 slides 100% 7/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides · 34 hits 42.9% 3/7 slides 85.7% 6/7 slides · 20 hits 42.9% 3/7 slides 100% 7/7 slides · 14 hits 85.7% 6/7 slides Solution & Approach 2 slides 100% 2/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides · 14 hits
— 0/2 slides
100% 2/2 slides · 9 hits 50% 1/2 slides 100% 2/2 slides · 4 hits 100% 2/2 slides Impact & Next Steps 1 slides 100% 1/1 slides 100% 1/1 slides · 7 hits
— 0/1 slides
100% 1/1 slides · 4 hits
— 0/1 slides
100% 1/1 slides · 2 hits 100% 1/1 slides

Slide inventory

41
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
front_matter
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
03
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown
04
present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown
05
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast First-Class Mail and Standard Mail, with visual examples for each sub-segment.decompose_segments
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown
06
The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) plot to visualize volume distribution across multiple categorical dimensions.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Mece Breakdown
07
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & Complication
08
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
09
The chart uses a BCG-branded background. It highlights a -1.5% annual decline rate.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
10
Uses green arrows for positive trends and red arrows for negative trends for USPS.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
11
The chart uses a dual-line forecast (Sender vs Consumer perspective) and compares it against a worst-case EU benchmark.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
12
The chart shows a sharp decline after 2008 and projects three distinct recovery paths through 2020.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
13
The chart uses a Marimekko (mosaic) layout to show volume distribution across segments and sender types.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
14
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It presents qualitative evidence to support a quantitative trend.illustrate_case
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · So What Cascade
15
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
16
The slide uses a dual-chart layout to demonstrate a causal link between broadband adoption and mail volume decline across multiple countries.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
17
The chart uses a regression line with an R-squared value of 0.57 to illustrate the relationship.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Benchmark Gap
18
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & Proof
19
The slide uses a dark green background typical of BCG decks. It includes a specific callout for the -44% change in First-Class Mail revenue.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork
20
The matrix uses a 3x3 grid to show volume outcomes. Callouts provide context for the extreme scenarios (top-right and bottom-left).analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork
21
Uses a simple binary classification (positive/negative) for various risk/opportunity factors.diagnose
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Scenario Fork
22
The slide uses a 2x2-like matrix structure to contrast 'Conventional' vs 'Structural' changes across revenue and cost dimensions.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Precedent
23
The slide uses a two-column layout to contrast implemented changes versus proposed changes in postal delivery frequency and scope.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Precedent
24
BCG branded slide.recommend
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Precedent
25
transition
Open slide detail
26
The chart illustrates the net impact of growth factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth) and diversion factors (Autopay, Online/Mobile presentment) on total volumequantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
27
The chart shows a starting volume of 14.4B in 2009 and an ending volume of 11.0B in 2020, with various positive and negative drivers in between.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
28
The chart shows a net decrease from 8.5B to 4.5B, with various positive and negative drivers.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
29
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show how various factors (Mail rebound, Organic growth, Autopay, etc.) contribute to the net change in payment volume.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
30
The chart shows a net decrease from 11.4B to 8.0B units, with positive drivers (rebound, growth, targeting) and negative drivers (shift to standard, online, emaquantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
31
The chart illustrates a bridge from 32.1B to 38.0B units.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
32
The chart illustrates a bridge from 2009 volume to 2020 volume, highlighting specific growth and decline drivers.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
33
The chart illustrates how various factors (rebound, growth, online, targeting, mobile, TV) contribute to the net change in volume.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Waterfall Value
34
transition
Open slide detail
35
Uses Harvey balls to represent improvement scores for various online service features.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
36
Uses Harvey balls to represent scores for various service improvements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
37
Uses Harvey balls to represent survey scores for service improvements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
38
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online ad improvements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
39
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
40
Uses Harvey balls to represent qualitative scores for online advertising improvements.quantify_impact
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer
41
The chart uses a grouped bar chart format to compare two categories (bill received in mail vs online) across seven segments of internet experience.analyze_data
Open slide detailLoop · Voice Of Customer