Climate Change: BCG’s Perspectives and Offerings

BCG
arc beats above · slides in the middle · loops below · scroll → 7 LOOPS
SETUP TENSION ANALYSIS EVIDENCE RESOLUTION APPENDIX
HOVER FOR DETAILS · CLICK A SLIDE FOR FULLSCREEN · STEP 2
No image bound to this slide. Wire up imgproxy to display the rendered slide JPEG.

Deck intelligence map

5
coverage by narrative range · generated from this deck JSON

Slide inventory

33
every slide · same image gating as the playbook
01
Slide 1
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & Context
02
The chart uses a reverse chronological x-axis (millenia before today).establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
03
analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
04
establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
05
The slide uses color-coded dots on a map to represent specific environmental risks associated with global temperature increases.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
06
The chart uses a reverse chronological scale on the x-axis (past to future).establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Situation & ContextLoop · Pattern Hunter
07
The slide uses a visual gradient from green to parched earth to illustrate the severity of climate change scenarios.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
08
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
09
The chart uses a marimekko (mosaic) plot to visualize both the relative size of sectors and their internal composition.analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
10
The slide uses a color-coded map (red for higher emitters, yellow for lower) with callout circles for specific percentages.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
11
The chart highlights the 'emissions gap' between current policy trajectories and climate targets.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction
12
The chart uses a bubble plot to represent multi-dimensional data (intensity, per capita, and total emissions).compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Funnel Analysis
13
The slide uses a map as a background to contextualize emission reduction targets for specific countries.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Funnel Analysis
14
The map highlights that the vast majority of global emissions are not covered by net-zero commitments.establish_context
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Funnel Analysis
15
The funnel visualizes a filtering process of countries based on climate policy maturity.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Funnel Analysis
16
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & Approach
17
The map uses isometric icons to represent sector-specific decarbonization measures.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork
18
The slide uses an isometric map of Germany as a central visual anchor to map sector-specific decarbonization strategies.present_solution
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork
19
The chart uses a waterfall structure to illustrate the reduction of CO2e emissions through specific technological interventions.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Solution & ApproachLoop · Scenario Fork
20
quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Myth Buster
21
Uses a contrast-based visual layout to frame the economic argument.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Myth Buster
22
The slide uses flags to represent countries and pairs them with investment percentage ranges relative to GDP.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Myth Buster
23
summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Domino Effect
24
The slide uses bar charts to illustrate the decline of fossil fuel usage under aggressive climate targets.quantify_impact
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Domino Effect
25
The slide uses a hierarchical structure to categorize policy interventions by sector.present_framework
Open slide detailBeat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Domino Effect
26
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
27
The chart highlights a discrepancy between company-level growth plans and broader industry forecasts.frame_problem
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Precedent
28
The chart uses a floating bar representation to show the range between first and third quartiles, with a red dot indicating the median.compare_peers
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Precedent
29
The title contains a typo ('shringing' instead of 'shrinking').analyze_data
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Precedent
30
Uses the Kodak vs. Fujifilm case study as an analogy for the oil industry's future.compare_options
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Precedent
31
The slide contrasts current energy sector investments with future CCUS requirements to emphasize the scale of the transition.size_opportunity
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Precedent
32
Uses a 'This... still requires a lot of this' framing to bridge traditional skills with new energy applications.summarize
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps
33
transition
Open slide detailBeat · Impact & Next Steps