slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
23,791-23,820 of 319,975
09
The slide uses a maturity-model-like progression to categorize OEM strategies.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
10
The slide uses a custom table structure to compare strategic archetypes in the automotive industry.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
11
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix structure to evaluate different OEM archetypes (BEV laggards, Midfield, BEV pioneers) against market scenarios (Accelerated, Current, Slower).The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
12
The slide uses a matrix structure to compare three OEM archetypes against three market scenarios, with color-coded NPV impacts.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Agitation1 hit
13
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to compare profit outcomes across three archetypes and three market scenarios.The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · AgitationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
15
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
16
The Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of ElectromobilityThe Combustion Engine Business Model in the Age of Electromobility · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
01
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
02
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
03
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
04
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
05
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Situation & Context1 hit
06
Includes IACCM logo and a vintage illustration.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
07
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
08
The IACCM '10 Pitfalls' graphic is used as a diagnostic reference point for why a new solution is needed.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
09
The slide uses a metaphorical graphic of a globe hatching from an egg, symbolizing an 'emerging era'.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
10
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
11
The slide lists office locations by region and provides high-level firm statistics.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
12
Includes AEP, Purchasing Chessboard, ROSMA, and HPT frameworks.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
13
The slide acts as a bibliography or catalog of previous publications.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
14
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
15
The slide uses a chevron-based process flow diagram to illustrate the procurement lifecycle.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
16
The slide uses a matrix-like layout to segment vendors by functional area and solution type.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
17
The slide uses a hub-and-spoke model to represent an ecosystem of microservices.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
18
The slide uses a maturity-model-like progression from monolithic suites to best-of-breed ecosystems.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
19
The diagram maps a procurement process from user request to delivery, highlighting the role of a centralized AI data hub.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
20
The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
21
The chart uses a treemap layout to represent market size by spend volume, with color-coding to distinguish governance requirements.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit
22
The slide uses a 2x2 matrix to categorize vendors. It includes annotations explaining the characteristics of each quadrant.The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind? · SirionLabs
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Solution & Approach1 hit