anlak storytelling
All kinds
Document kinds
Loading document kinds...

Primary corpus lens for browsing and insights. Selection lives in the URL.

All formats
Orientation
Loading formats...

Landscape, portrait, square, or unknown document geometry.

Unlock
slides · global inventory

All filtered slides

Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.

Search Insights JSON Unlock
Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations
18 30 60

Slide collection

4,321-4,380 of 319,975

filter-aware
107
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 8, EF 24, EF 30) and their overlaps with other operational areas or administrative processes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
108
The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
109
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
110
The table shows zero values for all years, indicating no financial overlap identified for these specific proposals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
111
The table shows negative values representing the overlap (deduction) between efficiency initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
112
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
113
The table shows negative values, indicating cost reductions or savings associated with the identified overlaps.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
114
The table outlines two specific efficiency proposal overlaps (EF 45 and general overhead reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
115
The table outlines four specific initiatives (Logistics, Structure/Concepts, Materiel/IT, and Cross-functional) and their financial impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
116
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Action (Now What)1 hit
117
The slide outlines financial potential (855-1.135M DKK), implementation timeline (2018-2022), FTE reductions (684-931), and overhead/turnover assumptions.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
118
The table includes a specific highlight (green oval) around the 2022 total net potential of 855-1135 million DKK.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
119
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to present quantitative data across time and categories.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
120
The slide compares current assumptions against future decision points regarding personnel turnover and resource allocation within the Danish Defense.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
121
The table includes rows for specific operational areas, overlaps, total net potential, average percentage, investments, and final net potential excluding investments.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
122
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the distribution of FTE (årsværk) adjustments. Includes source attribution to BCG and Struensee & Co.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
123
The chart displays FTE reductions across three categories: Operative, IT/Material, and Administrative, with a total column. Data is segmented by year and estimate level.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
124
The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
125
The chart highlights that most reductions occur at middle management (M2xx) and leadership levels. Data is split into low and high estimates.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
126
The chart compares current structure with two proposed scenarios (low span vs high span) across four job levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
127
The chart compares current staffing levels against two proposed scenarios (low and high range) across four management levels.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
128
The table breaks down budget reductions by department and category (operative, support/IT, administrative, and overlaps).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
129
The table breaks down budget impacts by department and category (operational, materiel/IT, administrative, and overlaps).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
130
The table displays financial and operational potential (Løn/ØD) across multiple organizational units. BCG/Struensee branding present.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
131
The table displays financial or resource potential values across multiple organizational units (VFK, Hæren, Søværnet, etc.) and specific initiatives (26-35).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
132
The table breaks down financial potential (Løn, ØD, Anlæg) by specific organizational units and initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
133
The table displays 'Løn' (Salary) and 'ØD' (Operating Expenses) impacts for 25 initiatives across multiple organizational units.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
134
The table displays financial impact data across multiple organizational units. The rows represent specific initiatives, and columns represent organizational entities.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
135
The table includes rows for specific initiatives (36-45) and summary rows for overlaps and totals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
136
The table maps specific efficiency proposals (numbered 7, 12, 13, 15, 16, 21) to their corresponding task eliminations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
137
Data source: Notat af 29. maj 2017 fra FMN.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
138
The slide details collaboration with FES (Forsvarets Bygnings- og Etablissementstjeneste) and VFK (Værnsfælles Forsvarskommando) to assess infrastructure needs and financial implications.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next Steps1 hit
139
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
140
The slide lists specific operational efficiency proposals that were deemed unfeasible due to lack of revenue, time constraints, or mutual exclusivity.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Elimination1 hit
141
The slide is part of a series (II/V) documenting discarded efficiency measures for the Danish Armed Forces.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Elimination1 hit
142
The slide is part of a series (III/V) documenting discarded efficiency measures.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Elimination1 hit
143
The slide lists specific organizational proposals (e.g., Frederiksberg Slot, Army training consolidation, Arctic Command) and explains why they were dropped (usually because they were already covered by other reorganization plans or deemed unfeasible).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Elimination1 hit
144
The slide lists two specific areas where efficiency proposals were considered but ultimately discarded.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Elimination1 hit
145
The slide uses a structured table format to outline the logistics reorganization initiative, including financial impact and operational considerations.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
146
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case for a specific military procurement initiative.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
147
The slide uses a structured table format to present a business case/diagnosis for organizational optimization.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Build Up1 hit
148
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
149
The slide uses a simple table-like structure to distinguish between primary and secondary goals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
150
The slide serves as a disclaimer/limitation note for a scaling model developed by BCG/Struensee.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
151
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
152
The slide uses a two-column comparison structure to define tasks vs. capabilities in a military/defense context.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
153
The slide uses a sequential process framework to define the analytical approach.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
154
The slide outlines a methodology for capacity selection, cost definition, scaling analysis, and economic impact assessment.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
155
The slide uses a funnel framework to visualize the filtering process of military capabilities.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
156
The slide uses a logic of additive cost components leading to a total base, followed by exclusions and a normalization approach for representative costs.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
157
The diagram illustrates a causal chain where task scaling leads to activity changes, which then drive resource and cost requirements.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
158
The slide uses a causal chain/process flow to illustrate how scaling decisions propagate through activity levels to cost impacts.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
159
The slide outlines a three-step logic: estimating representative costs, multiplying by scenario units, and applying time-based phasing profiles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
160
The slide uses a 2x2 grid layout to present a four-step process.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
161
The slide serves as a disclaimer/methodological disclosure for a financial or operational model.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
162
The slide uses a two-column layout to map excluded capabilities to their specific exclusion criteria.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Zoom In1 hit
163
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting 1 hit
164
Includes a footnote regarding Army capabilities and cost variations based on deployment duration.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
165
The table includes a legend for 'Basis for 2017' and detailed footnotes explaining the methodology and specific scenario constraints.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit
166
The slide uses a scenario-based comparison framework to evaluate operational scaling options.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Loop · Scenario Fork1 hit