Corpus coverage

319,975 slides

319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.

Total slides
319,975
Described
319,974
Pending
1

Slide type composition

dynamicclickable
Slide type

Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages

Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.

all document kinds · all orientations

Slide collection

13,111-13,140 of 319,975

filter-aware
06
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
07
The chart uses a waterfall structure to isolate the impact of policy on electricity demand projections.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
08
The chart uses a 'Policy Off' scenario. CAGR values are provided for specific sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
09
The slide uses a waterfall-like logic to sum the impacts of two sectors on total electricity demand.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
10
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
11
The slide outlines specific assumptions for societal vs private perspectives and defines inclusions/exclusions for abatement and cost calculations.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & Complication1 hit
12
The chart uses a waterfall structure to show the cumulative impact of efficiency measures on the baseline demand.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Problem & ComplicationLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
13
This is a classic McKinsey-style abatement cost curve.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
14
The chart is a classic McKinsey-style abatement cost curve.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
15
Uses waterfall-style logic to show the decomposition of abatement potential.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
16
The slide uses a waterfall-style layout for data presentation, categorizing measures into four segments: Buildings, Heating and air-conditioning, Appliances/electronics, and Lighting.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
17
The slide uses a table structure to compare different energy efficiency measures. It highlights the 'share of sector potential' for specific categories.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
18
The slide uses a table format to compare various abatement measures across three key metrics.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
19
The slide uses a waterfall-style layout for the electricity savings column. The 'Share of sector potential' is highlighted for Motors (26%) and Pumps (40%).UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
20
The table uses a mix of bar charts and numerical data to compare different industrial efficiency levers.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
21
The slide uses a matrix layout to visualize sensitivity analysis.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Logic Chain1 hit
22
The slide uses a 3x3 matrix to demonstrate sensitivity, highlighting that discount rate changes have a larger impact on abatement cost than CO2 price changes.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
23
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
24
The slide uses a Gantt-chart style visualization to map policy duration and status (active vs. in consultation) across three sectors.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
25
The table uses a hierarchical structure to group measures by sector and provides specific descriptions for each category.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
26
The slide uses a color-coded matrix to indicate the extent of policy coverage for specific energy efficiency measures.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
27
The slide uses a color-coded bubble system to indicate the percentage of potential captured.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
28
The slide uses a color-coded bubble system to indicate the percentage of potential captured.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
29
The table highlights that most measures have low capture rates (<25%) by current Building Regulations.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
30
The slide highlights that broad policies like EU ETS have limited incremental impact on electricity demand once overlaps are accounted for.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
31
UK Electricity Efficiency PotentialUK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
32
The slide uses a numbered list with lettered sub-points to organize qualitative findings.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
33
The slide uses a two-row structure to categorize insights into 'Policy gap' and 'Complex/changing landscape', supported by qualitative user quotes.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
34
The slide uses a 'C' label for the category and includes a footnote regarding CCAs.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit
35
The slide uses a hierarchical table structure to map barriers to their descriptions and real-world examples.UK Electricity Efficiency Potential · McKinsey
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & Proof1 hit