slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
233,821-233,880 of 319,975
12
The chart uses a dashed box to highlight PFE and a dashed red line to indicate the peer median of 46 drugs.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
13
Uses authority bias to validate the activist's thesis that the company was already well-positioned for growth.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
14
The slide uses a series of quotes to establish a narrative of management over-promising on pipeline quality.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
15
The slide uses a quote to highlight a specific management commitment, likely to be contrasted with later performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
16
The slide is used by Starboard Value to contrast Pfizer's historical R&D projections with current performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
17
The slide uses a table to track 15 specific drug programs, noting their therapeutic area, next steps, and timing, with symbols indicating status (check for approval, star for designation, box for negative data).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
18
The slide uses a table to highlight specific programs that had already achieved approvals or failed (negative pivotal data) to challenge the company's narrative.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
19
The slide uses a table from a third-party source (Pfizer) to build an activist argument about management performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
20
The slide uses a dashed line to represent the blockbuster threshold and includes a callout box explaining the donation of royalties.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)Loop · Iceberg1 hit
21
Uses a screenshot of a news article as evidence of failure.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
22
Uses a red arrow annotation to emphasize the gap between projected 2030 sales and the blockbuster threshold.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
23
The slide uses a visual gap analysis to highlight the shortfall against a market benchmark.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
24
The slide uses a highlighted excerpt from a third-party report to undermine the company's R&D track record.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
25
The slide uses a screenshot of a press release to validate the claim of continued product success.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
26
The slide uses analyst quotes to build a case for competitive pressure on Pfizer's core product.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
27
The slide uses a direct quote from a press release to highlight a clinical trial failure.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
28
The slide uses a primary source excerpt to establish the clinical efficacy and subsequent commercial success of the drug.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
29
The slide uses a screenshot of a news article as evidence.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
30
The slide highlights a contradiction between the CEO's stated focus on innovation and the market's focus on shareholder return.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Agitate (Make it worse)1 hit
31
The slide uses a 'before-after' framing by contrasting past management promises with current performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
32
Uses highlighted text to draw attention to specific claims within the quotes.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
33
The slide highlights the skepticism of Wall Street analysts regarding management's projections.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
34
Uses a 'villain critique' style to undermine management's R&D track record.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
35
The chart highlights the massive gap between company optimism and market reality.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
36
The chart highlights the divergence in GLP-1 success between the two peers and the implied laggard (Pfizer).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
37
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
38
The chart highlights Pfizer's underperformance relative to peers, including a specific callout for 'PFE Excl. COVID'.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
39
The chart uses a 'broken axis' visual style for the top two bars (LLY, NVO) to accommodate their significantly higher growth rates.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
40
The chart uses a broken axis for the top two performers (NVO, LLY) to accommodate the scale.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
41
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
42
The slide highlights the scale of capital allocation into M&A, framing it as a potential misuse of COVID-19 windfall cash.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
43
The slide uses a visual comparison to contrast the $70B spend against the $20.5B revenue target, implying poor capital allocation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
44
The chart uses a red bar to emphasize the outlier status of the 'PFE Consolidated Deals (Mgmt)' metric.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
45
The slide uses a stacked bar chart to contrast company expectations ($20.5bn) against sell-side consensus ($13.3bn).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
46
The chart highlights the discrepancy between management's valuation assumptions and consensus expectations.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
47
The slide uses a combination of a table and a bar chart to illustrate the delta in valuation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
48
Uses a press release excerpt with annotations to build a valuation argument.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
49
The slide uses a direct quote/screenshot from a press release to undermine the value of a previous acquisition (GBT).Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
50
The slide uses analyst quotes to frame Pfizer's acquisition strategy as flawed.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Loop · Cost Of Inaction1 hit
51
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
52
Uses checkmarks and X marks to visualize performance; highlights 2021-2022 as a 'COVID Benefit' period.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
53
The chart uses color coding (red bars) to emphasize Pfizer's lower consistency compared to the peer group.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
54
Uses red 'X' icons to visually emphasize the failure to meet expectations.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
55
The slide uses a waterfall-like annotation to explain the drop in sales from 2022 to 2023.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
56
The slide uses a chart to highlight management's optimistic outlook, likely to contrast with actual performance or market skepticism.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
57
The slide uses a red color for the actuals bar and the annotation to emphasize the negative performance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
58
Uses red color coding to emphasize the negative performance and missed guidance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
59
Uses a red-blue contrast to emphasize the negative gap between market expectations and company guidance.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
60
The slide uses bolded and underlined text within quotes to highlight key negative sentiment.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor 1 hit
61
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
62
The slide uses highlighting to emphasize key phrases in the CEO's quote regarding TSR and innovation.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
63
The chart uses a red vertical arrow to explicitly quantify the 132-point gap between the S&P 500 and Pfizer.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
64
The slide uses a competitor's own slide to demonstrate failure to meet stated objectives.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
65
Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slidesStarboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit
66
The chart uses a broken axis for the top two performers (NVO, LLY) to accommodate the scale.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
67
Uses a simple division framework to highlight capital allocation inefficiency.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
68
The slide uses a waterfall chart to critique capital allocation efficiency.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
69
Uses a 'bridge' style calculation to derive an incremental revenue requirement.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
70
The chart uses a standard waterfall bridge format to show the impact of LOEs and growth on 2030 revenue projections.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)Loop · Mece Breakdown1 hit
71
Uses a simple causal chain diagram to link the target return to financial outcomes.Starboard Value | Activist Presentation Deck | 74 slides · Starboard Value
Activist deck Activist investor Beat · Solution (Provide relief)1 hit