slides · global inventory
All filtered slides
Global slide inventory for the active corpus filters, with each row opening the slide detail view.
Corpus coverage
319,975 slides
319,974 are described (100%), so the treemap can explain the corpus instead of just counting files.
- Total slides
- 319,975
- Described
- 319,974
- Pending
- 1
100%ready for canon
Slide type composition
dynamicclickable
Slide type
Showing 319,974 described slides — 100.0% of 319,975 rendered pages
+Context & problem43,76713.7% · 6,592 docs+Data & charts72,62022.7% · 8,666 docs+Meta & navigation45,93614.4% · 9,739 docs+Recommend & act67,04121.0% · 9,324 docs+Cases & evidence31,2569.8% · 6,067 docs+Frameworks2,1230.7% · 1,232 docs+Appendix35,68211.2% · 6,614 docs+Other21,5496.7% · 5,566 docs
Tile area is proportional to slide count. Click a category to open its subtype map.
all document kinds · all orientations
Slide collection
4,321-4,338 of 319,975
107
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 8, EF 24, EF 30) and their overlaps with other operational areas or administrative processes.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
108
The table shows specific overlaps between efficiency initiatives, noting that some have zero impact while others show negative values (savings/reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
109
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 14, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
110
The table shows zero values for all years, indicating no financial overlap identified for these specific proposals.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
111
The table shows negative values representing the overlap (deduction) between efficiency initiatives.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
112
The table lists specific efficiency proposals (EF 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 42) and their interdependencies.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
113
The table shows negative values, indicating cost reductions or savings associated with the identified overlaps.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
114
The table outlines two specific efficiency proposal overlaps (EF 45 and general overhead reductions).Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
115
The table outlines four specific initiatives (Logistics, Structure/Concepts, Materiel/IT, and Cross-functional) and their financial impact.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Evidence & ProofLoop · Sensitivity Test1 hit
116
Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · The Action (Now What)1 hit
117
The slide outlines financial potential (855-1.135M DKK), implementation timeline (2018-2022), FTE reductions (684-931), and overhead/turnover assumptions.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
118
The table includes a specific highlight (green oval) around the 2022 total net potential of 855-1135 million DKK.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
119
The slide uses a matrix-like structure to present quantitative data across time and categories.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
120
The slide compares current assumptions against future decision points regarding personnel turnover and resource allocation within the Danish Defense.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
121
The table includes rows for specific operational areas, overlaps, total net potential, average percentage, investments, and final net potential excluding investments.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Waterfall Value1 hit
122
The slide uses a waterfall-style logic to show the distribution of FTE (årsværk) adjustments. Includes source attribution to BCG and Struensee & Co.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
123
The chart displays FTE reductions across three categories: Operative, IT/Material, and Administrative, with a total column. Data is segmented by year and estimate level.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit
124
The chart shows negative values for 'Civile' and positive values for the other three categories, indicating a conversion or shift in roles.Budgetanalyse af Forsvaret 2017 · BCG
Consulting deck Strategy consulting Beat · Impact & Next StepsLoop · Segmentation Split1 hit